Overall Satisfaction with Snowflake
Snowflake is being used on top of our Azure data warehouse. It solves our issue of queries running at the same time and has drastically improved our server performance. All of our reports connect to Snowflake and they all run very fast. It is currently being used across the entire company.
- You are able to adjust the power that you give a query. For the big queries, you can give more CPU to it so it runs faster.
- It can now sit on Google Cloud, S3, and Azure.
- Concurrency is a thing of the past.
- I'd love to see a desktop tool for Snowflake. Currently, it is all web-based.
- Database navigation can be smoother. It's not as efficient as a SQL workbench.
- Row-level security is possible, but it was difficult to figure out.
- One positive is that query times are better, making end-users happier.
- Migration from Redshift to Snowflake was very easy.
- The Snowflake community is definitely a positive as well.
Our issue with Redshift was that it was very expensive. On top of that, queries were still slow and if we used more of Redshift's memory, then it would have cost even more. Snowflake is not cheap, but less costly for us. Plus, the performance was much better. Also, we got to keep Amazon S3 since Snowflake was compatible with it.
Do you think Snowflake delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Snowflake's feature set?
Yes
Did Snowflake live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Snowflake go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Snowflake again?
Yes