Symantec is a trusted name for an edge to edge user and network protection solution
April 30, 2021
Symantec is a trusted name for an edge to edge user and network protection solution

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is currently being used in various organizations and departments. In most cases, it is being used as an endpoint threat detection and protection tool to prevent unwanted and unauthorized access from external networks into the network and onto end points such as personal devices.
Pros
- Uses Symantec's vast experience in threat protection
- Symantec's global presence and information sharing
- Large customer base results in knowledge of potential threats at infancy stage
Cons
- As in most software, it can always be easier to use for non-technical clients
- When it comes to security, detection speed is key and can never be fast enough
- For some end users, the application itself can be slow to respond
- Ease of use
- Ease of implementation
- Ease of management
- Speed and trust in real-time protection
- relatively low cost solution
- appropriate solution in a lot of end-user and network protection scenarios
- well known brand with a strong reputation makes it a trusted investment
Symantec meets and in almost all cases exceeds the offering of other products in the same or similar categories.
It is however, one of the few companies that offers a wide ranging array of solutions that can protect and organization from top to bottom. It is not a singularly focused solution for edge or end user, but can be a near all-in-one solution.
Do you think Symantec Advanced Threat Protection delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's feature set?
Yes
Did Symantec Advanced Threat Protection live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Symantec Advanced Threat Protection go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Symantec Advanced Threat Protection again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation