Implementation underway, but so far so good
Overall Satisfaction with Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS)
We plan to use Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) as a Connectivity Hub, with all payments originating from various systems routed to Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) before going to the banks. Also, Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) will receive bank statements from banks and route those the systems that need to consume them. We are currently going through the implementation, which we expect to last another year
Pros
- Connectivity
- Payments Visibility
Cons
- Swift Service Bureau
- reduced IT costs
- increase payment visibility
It has reduced IT costs to configure transformation of payment files for multiple banks in a large number of countries. It will also reduce the reliance (and associated risks) with using bank portals for payments
It allows us to better understand volumes and payment types, that allows to better manage our working capital as well as the fees charged by banks to execute payments
It provides centralization for payment execution, simplifying workflows and simplifying training for users, as now it's only one system instead of multiple banking platforms
We evaluated a number of vendors including Kyriba, Fides and FIS-Trax. Ultimately Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS) was the solution of choice given a combination of better fit-for-purpose and pricing, although there are other technologies out there that could have supported our requirements
Do you think TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)'s feature set?
Yes
Did TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions) again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation