Xcode - the obvious choice for Apple ecosphere application development
Overall Satisfaction with Xcode
Xcode is the primary (and only) IDE that we use for macOS and iOS application development as well as scripts and stand-alone Unix binaries. Xcode is produced and supported by Apple and therefore is the premiere IDE for application development in the Apple ecosphere. We also deploy Xcode in the library and in certain labs for programming courses. Usage audience is developers and students.
Pros
- Immediate implementation and integration with new features
- Code completion
- AI code suggestion
- Comprehensive options for builds
- Workflow customization
- Since it is Apple's tool, problems get fixed quickly
Cons
- Documentation
- Number of settings can be overwhelming
- Embedded help for settings and configuration
- Templates
- Collaboration
- Managing of credentials (although this has recently gotten better)
- Xcode is free, and is supported at low cost by individual or organizational membership
- There are a lot of free resources available, which is particularly important to students and independent developers
- Since producing apps is not a core business function of the university, it is difficult to provide direct bottom-line tangible benefits, but frequently programming students come in with a basic understanding of Xcode already in place, which saves class time
- Producing standard structured code from a standard IDE makes it easier for sharing code with peer institutions
- Students expect to have university branded "helper" apps available, and Xcode makes it fairly easy to transport code from one contractor to another
- No negative impacts are immediately evident other than familiarization time with the IDE can be high if you try to know what everything does
Xcode is the clear choice in general circumstances in Apple echosphere application development (for instance, not for Java or web programming necessarily) primarily due to the fact that it is Apple's in-house tool. It received a lot of attention and is used by a huge audience of developers. It has the advantage of being free, heavily supported by Apple, tightly tied to OS and hardware changes, and benefits from significant Apple Intelligence enhancements in the latest version.
Do you think Xcode delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Xcode's feature set?
Yes
Did Xcode live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Xcode go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Xcode again?
Yes
Evaluating Xcode and Competitors
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
- Other
The most significant factor was that this is Apple's in-house tool, and therefore receives a lot of attention from Apple Engineering, both for bug fixes as well as new feature integration. There are always presentations at the annual WWDC conference regarding changes and new features in Xcode, given by the engineers and developers inside Apple who are responsible for the product.
Probably would not change much of anything. It was essentially a foregone conclusion that this was the tool that would be selected when we decided to support this development activity for staff, faculty, and students. The gap between Xcode and the other IDE's that are not situationally or language specific is fairly large, and trying to wedge in another third party IDE would just have introduced more friction into the process.
Using Xcode
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Code completion
- AI integration
- Compilation
- Framework management
- Understanding what the large set of options in the system do
- Certificate management (although this has improved)
- Finding a particular setting


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation