Abas ERP is an ERP with relatively extensive capabilities from supply chain optimization to customer relationship management
N/A
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Score5.3 out of 10
N/A
Aptean Made2Manage ERP is an enterprise resource planning software solution. It is built specifically for small and mid-sized manufacturers. It includes dynamic, to-order environments such as make-to-order, engineer-to-order, assemble-to-order, and mixed mode operations.
N/A
Pricing
Abas ERP
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Abas ERP
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Abas ERP
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
9.0
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
2 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
9.01 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Plug-ins
9.01 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
8.5
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.5
4 Ratings
82% below category average
Single sign-on capability
9.01 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.02 Ratings
2.04 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
8.0
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.7
4 Ratings
94% below category average
Dashboards
8.02 Ratings
2.04 Ratings
Standard reports
7.52 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Custom reports
8.52 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
8.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
4.9
5 Ratings
45% below category average
Accounts payable
7.01 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.01 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.01 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.01 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.01 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.01 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
4 Ratings
126% below category average
Inventory tracking
7.52 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
8.52 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Location management
8.02 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
8.3
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
5 Ratings
93% below category average
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.52 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.52 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
7.3
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
5.3
3 Ratings
35% below category average
Billing Management
8.01 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.01 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Period Close
8.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
7.4
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.3
2 Ratings
79% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
6.52 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Project Costing
7.02 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Cost Capture
7.02 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
7.8
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
1 Ratings
119% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.01 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
6.4
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
2 Ratings
84% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.01 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.01 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
7.0
2 Ratings
7% below category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
2 Ratings
97% below category average
Production Process Design
8.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Production Management
8.02 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Work Execution
9.01 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.02 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
5.8
2 Ratings
23% below category average
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.0
3 Ratings
114% below category average
Inventory Planning
6.52 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
5.01 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
-
Ratings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
2 Ratings
153% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
-
Ratings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.3
1 Ratings
105% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Feature
Abas ERP
-
Ratings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
1 Ratings
89% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Abas ERP and Aptean Made2Manage ERP
ABAS by far offers the most bang for the buck. We are able to handle all of our business functions through ABAS and also have additional features like Business Apps, Business Intelligence, Vendor and Customer portals, as well as many other features that many other ERP packages didn't have. It has allowed us to consolidate our software packages and also provide visibility since everything is now connected.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For parts sales, M2M is not a good program. There are too many glitches that happen between the sales order process and the shipping process. At the same time, we have to work with outside vendors to make certain functions work in the program. Or it has to work outside the program and communicate back to the main software. Way too clunky.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ABAS is headquartered in Germany with a US based headquarters in Virginia. Some of the programming structures were based on European methods that differed somewhat from the way business is done in the US. ABAS-USA has worked to modify the system so that it is in tune with US business practices and has made great strides in this effort. For the average user, the structures may go unnoticed, but for the more advanced user, some of the field names that are used for advanced reporting might be in German. However, ABAS-USA has recently been updating the programming language to be fully in English.
Because ABAS is growing rapidly, more complex customizations might take longer to complete than normal. ABAS appears to be bringing on even more technicians to handle the increased workload so the concern is waning.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am not in the decision making group any more for this product. When I was, I along with many other managers, voted to go with a competitive product software vs re-subscribing to Aptean for this product. We were convinced by certain parties at our work that the new product was head and shoulders above the old product. While they freshened up a few things and there was an increase in some functionality areas, it was still tired.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This software is not user-friendly nor easy to train on. I train people for various departments and had argued for the company to go with another company. I was not alone. When the time came for us to do an upgrade (necessitated by the advent of Windows 10 compatibility issues), a number of managers at our organization wanted to seek out other vendors due to the difficulty in training people to use the software. Then have to deal with so many of the user issues and lack of functionality created by the need for using an outside software programmer to bring in software that interpreted what M2M was doing and then translate it back into the program so that we had an end-user solution. This software should be robust enough to do it all. It is not. I hate to be so negative about it but anyone that has spent as many years using this software as I have should find something good to say about the platform and I struggle to do that. I had asked for the warranty section that would tie into the return authorization process. I was told it would happen. It didn't. Bad karma.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I go back to the warranty segment of the program to help track expenses that were generated by returns and zero-dollar sales orders to resolve customer issues. I feel like I was lied to by the company. They said they would have it in there on the new release. They told the purchasing manager it would be on the new release. The purchasing manager assured me it would be on there. They even showed 'warranty loading' on the screen when you signed in. However, there was no additional component of the return material authorization process for warranty adaptation. I even challenged our upload team about it and they had no answer. It does a few functions well but in my personal experience, buy something else.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The actual implementation was no worse or better than other software updates. There were days of pain and additional training helped overcome a lot of the learning curve associated with that. However, that training came from our own internal staff vs anyone from Aptean.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
These other software packages all have strengths but for what we were looking for in one system, to handle most of our business processes, but also allow the flexibility to be customized (without the need to be placed on a "like to have" waiting list), ABAS gave us that ability, hands down.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I came on board after M2M was implemented so I'm not sure how it has changed from previous software. However, I do know it has the ability to grow with the company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info