Adaface vs. CoderPad

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adaface
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
Adaface is an online assessment platform from the company of the same name in SIngapore, featuring tests for pre-employment screening and technical skills assessment.
$180
per year
CoderPad
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
CoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.
$50
per month
Pricing
AdafaceCoderPad
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Personal
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Team
$250
per month (30 interviews)
Business
$750
per month (90 interviews)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AdafaceCoderPad
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—$15/interview for overages
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AdafaceCoderPad
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
AdafaceCoderPad
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AdafaceCoderPad
Likelihood to Recommend
Adaface
It simply helps us internally and externally. By externally, I mean we usually do a quick round of initial testing using Adaface, and internally, I mean we are planning to use it as skills assessment tool for our purpose.I am not sure if there is any control over the googlability of questions. Unfortunately, I cannot edit some questions, whose test is not super clear and I would like to correct it. Many candidates say that the test is anxiety-provoking
Read full review
CoderPad
- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.
Read full review
Pros
Adaface
  • Addressing challenges in the recruitment process
  • Technical assessments on coding and other technical languages with ease
  • Streamlining the process of assessing candidates' skills
Read full review
CoderPad
  • Large range of supported languages
  • Code runs quickly
  • Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
Read full review
Cons
Adaface
  • Sometimes questions are not elaborated or don't have sufficient material to grasp them properly, due to which candidates cannot understand them properly.
  • There should be the option of providing hints as sometimes, we as recruiters, may require such features to judge a person on a few other factors as well.
Read full review
CoderPad
  • Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
  • Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
  • A transparent and publicly available pricing
Read full review
Usability
Adaface
No answers on this topic
CoderPad
CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adaface
No answers on this topic
CoderPad
We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Adaface
  • Has simplified our hiring process significantly, making for less expenditure during onboarding and interviewing
Read full review
CoderPad
  • 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
  • Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
  • The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts
Read full review
ScreenShots