Adobe InDesign vs. PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe InDesign
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Adobe InDesign supports creating digital and print documents such as flyers, stationary, posters, and other types of media, with rich graphics, images, and more. Adobe InDesign is available standalone or as part of the Adobe Creative Suite collection of media management and creation products.
$31.49
per month
PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor is a pdf editing and conversion software offering from Tracker Software Products. It includes features such as create pdf and convert to pdf.N/A
Pricing
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Editions & Modules
Monthly Plan
$31.49
per month
Annual Plan, Prepaid
$239.88 ($19.99)
per year (per month)
Annual Plan, Paid Monthly
$251.88 ($20.99)
per year (per month)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Considered Both Products
Adobe InDesign
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign has so many more features and capabilities when compared to Canva.
Chose Adobe InDesign
InDesign is better than Power Point and Libre Office because of the freedom to match and layout different types of file. In addition the management of the files on the layout and of the output quality has no comparison. Comparing to AutoCAD InDesign is more suited for …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Canva is a valuable design tool for simple applications, such as creating a social media banner, flyer, or leaflet, particularly for those with no prior design experience. Its use of templates and straightforward tools to add pictures and text makes it a good choice for …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign is a more cohesive program with stronger features and control. It is best used for more indepth presentations and publications. I use it primarily because it allows for more creative and personalized layouts which is useful for showcasing the work I present to …
Chose Adobe InDesign
InDesign's real benefit is it's integration with the other Adobe products, allowing you to work fairly seamlessly with multiple types of design file on a project. The creative cloud allows you to store and use assets quickly and efficiently on multiple projects and really …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign may have a steep learning curve and advanced interface, but the functionality it provides is more advanced that Publisher.

I used Publisher briefly for some brochures and flyers, and it is a good software for simple, quick solutions that do not require a lot of …
Chose Adobe InDesign
We use both in our company. Adobe InDesign for those more carefully considered, important design jobs. Canva for throwaway design jobs like flyers, newsletters, etc.
Chose Adobe InDesign
These mentioned softwares are great but also limiting. I like working on Adobe Illustrator but it's not meant to create page layouts while working on multiple pages.
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign is definitely better structured and perfectly organised. I am a huge supporter of creativity in the communication field, yet I believe in the importance of balance and design. Adobe InDesign proves to be stronger than its competitors because it leaves room for …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Quark used to be used much more. Adobe InDesign is now the preferred layout software for publishers. Canva is not as robust and does not have the same functionality.
Chose Adobe InDesign
I have used proprietary composition web applications at other publishers, and I have used Quark (which is less powerful/feature-rich) and LaTeX (which is great for what it does but is not right for all projects). I prefer InDesign for its universality. It can be used on just …
Chose Adobe InDesign
So basically, we just use Word Docs, generated PDFs from them, and combined them all into the reader. We decided to move to InDesign, because we were working with a graphic designer and it made a lot more sense to have an entire rebrand that read and felt differently. InDesign …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe Illustrator and QuarkXpress are great but also very limiting. I personally love illustrator but it's not meant to create page layouts when working on multiple pages and I'm used to working with QuarkXpress because of printers in the past but a majority of the printers …
Chose Adobe InDesign
I'm biased because Adobe InDesign is my favorite, I think that might be somewhat related to the ease of working with text, which I enjoy. I also just enjoy the ease of use of the software compared to other Adobe Creative Suite softwares. Adobe InDesign seems to be the easiest …
Chose Adobe InDesign
We can use AI to make catalog or sellsheets too, but it can not compete with [Adobe] InDesign, AI is useful for single page stuff, but it's a bit heavy while carries more pages and more links. While we are doing some artworks, we prefer to use AI, but once it has few more …
Chose Adobe InDesign
We use Adobe PhotoShop in tandem with Adobe InDesign when processing or manipulating images. It's the gold standard for working with images and getting everything just right. There is no other product on the market I can think of that compares with Adobe PhotoShop and if …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Microsoft products do not match the aesthetic tools that [Adobe] InDesign offers, cannot support the customizable options available for export, and do not produce documents with as high a degree of accessibility. That said, they do have their place in collaboration in a team- …
Chose Adobe InDesign
The other software I listed are not specifically made for layout. Maybe the closest option is Photoshop. I personally find Photoshop more intended for image editing than layout creating. In the architectural field, it is not unheard of for students or practitioners to use …
Chose Adobe InDesign
I have previously used Quark Xpress, but as Adobe InDesign became the leader for professional designers, I transitioned to [Adobe] InDesign. I find Adobe InDesign a lot easier to work with. I have tried Affinity Publisher, but I have not [gotten] very far with trying it out. I …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign is a much different platform for document creation and publishing compared to Adobe Photoshop. With Photoshop your goal is to start with or create an image and make all modifications and adjustments within that program. InDesign takes those finished images and …
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign is much more intuitive to use, and is set up better for beautiful design presentations.
Chose Adobe InDesign
Adobe InDesign allows for quicker, simpler, and more powerful manipulation of images and text. Photoshop, granted is not for text editing, has weak text tools. Illustrator, granted is not for pixel-based image editing, can be weak for combining text and images in one file. …
Chose Adobe InDesign
InDesign is the layout monopoly, although in a pinch I've used Photoshop and PowerPoint, which, if you have a good digital printer, will work just fine.
Chose Adobe InDesign
InDesign is much more user friendly and is compatible with other Adobe products. InDesign is more versatile and more widely used. Compatibility with other designers, agencies, and promo companies makes work and collaboration easier.
PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Chose PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
I have had problems with other software crashing with large PDF files, except for Adobe. However, Adobe Acrobat is very expensive, and this has done as well for me as Adobe Acrobat. I also dislike monthly fees since income for our business can rise and fall. I prefer to …
Chose PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
PDF Xchange hits a sweet spot for me and my users. It is powerful, includes a full suite of creation, markup, and management tools. It is very affordable.
Chose PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Better price for single licenses and user packs.
Chose PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
A license and an Adobe Account are needed for Adobe Acrobat DC. PDF Xchange is easy to get it up and running without any of the login information. It saves the hassle of having to be bogged down by Cloud features and other features. PDF Xchange is simple, free of promotional …
Features
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
PDF Editors
Comparison of PDF Editors features of Product A and Product B
Adobe InDesign
-
Ratings
PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
9.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Edit Text and Images00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Merge or Split PDFs00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Add Annotations00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Text Recognition (OCR)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form Creation and Editing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Secure PDFs00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Convert to Different Formats00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Comment and Review Tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Undo and Redo Actions00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Small Businesses
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
Score 7.5 out of 10
Tungsten Power PDF
Tungsten Power PDF
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
pdfFiller
pdfFiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
Score 7.5 out of 10
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe InDesignPDF Xchange Viewer and Editor
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe InDesign is very well suited to image-heavy publications, such as children's books, cookbooks and coffee table books. It gives you almost complete control how to arrange these elements, and to be able to tweak them with precision. The software is an absolute necessity if one is developing interactive eBooks, especially for the Apple iTunes store. Unless coded by hand, I am not aware of any other tools to handle this. It is a powerful toolset, and can take on most anything publishing related that you throw at it. I personally have found that it doesn't do too well with reflowable eBooks (like for Kindle Amazon), but it retains that capability.
Read full review
If you'd like to switch from Adobe to a less expensive and more robust solution, you can choose PDF X Change. It does everything other expensive solutions do. We are using it to add some additional information on scanned PDF files and Sign them and it does it in a simple and easy way. You can use to combine multiple files into one, creating PDF from different resources.
Read full review
Pros
  • Customization - With Adobe InDesign, as well as many other applications in the Adobe Creative Suite, I can fully customize my workspaces and save different workspaces. This makes it easy to navigate through my project and have the panels and tools I need easily accessible and configured based on my project needs.
  • Styles - Adobe InDesign has character styles, object styles, and tables styles. This speeds up my workflows and allows me to easily apply the same format across multiple elements. This is super helpful, especially when working with length documents.
  • File compatibility - I can easily export my files into so many different file types.
  • The Book feature - This feature is really helpful when creating books or very long documents with multiple sections.
Read full review
  • Seamless integration with Office Tools, AutoCAD, and BricsCAD
  • Powerful editing suite of tools to markup and share PDFs
  • Power API for extended capabilities
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be wonderful if InDesign would do automatic spell- and grammar-checking like Microsoft Word or Google Docs. While it is possible to spell-check your documents, the technology could be improved by being automatic and grammar-checking.
  • It can be really frustrating that keyboard shortcuts are different for the same tool between different Adobe products. I wish they would make shared tools the same shortcut. For someone who uses multiple Adobe products, usually in conjunction, it can be hard to remember which program is which keyboard shortcut and not accidentally select the wrong tool.
  • While I listed the linked images as being a pro, it can be a con if users don't package their files (especially when working with others on the same file). It would be really helpful if Adobe automatically populated a package file with images assets and typefaces. I can't tell you how many times I have been unable to locate a linked file or had to request them from a colleague.
Read full review
  • It is not as intuitive as some PDF editors.
  • I often use the search function to find the feature I am looking for.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I've had great experiences with the product and plan to continue to use it. It has been my go-to product for designing and creating materials. I have had great luck with it and have been able to create all of the needed marketing materials that have been requested for our company.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
If you know what you are doing it is an amazingly granular and powerful application. You can control pretty much any aspect of the design and layout of your documents and make changes globally and rapidly. But, if you don't know what you are doing...you will be staring at your screen in bewilderment for a long time. You can learn it, but be ready for a hefty time investment.
Read full review
It does everything I need, such as OCR, redaction, Bates stamping, bookmarking, and handling large PDF files without crashing. It also does well with the extraction and addition of documents.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I've needed Adobe InDesign team very little which is a bonus in and of itself.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
One of the advantages of Adobe InDesign is it is faster and less glitchy than Microsoft Word.
Read full review
Performance wise, PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor is flawless. It runs fast, and I haven't experienced any immediately crashing. The reports save quickly, and the document size is never an issue. It saves into a regular PDF, and we're able to open it on any other program or computer. All text boxes, features, and headers show up flawlessly on other programs.
Read full review
Support Rating
Adobe support is ok but not great. Chat support often doesn't initially understand the question at-hand and it takes awhile to get to the right agent. Phone support has long wait times, and though I've had more luck there, it does take quite a time investment if you are looking for help. However, Adobe does have some online learning solutions available as well as a knowledgebase for frequently asked questions. If you're looking to learn how to use the platform, there are lots of resources which can typically be found in a few Google searches. If you have a technical issue with the system, that's going to be a bit more of a time investment as far as getting a tech's assistance to resolve the problem.
Read full review
The application had no issues (we did not contact support) and that's why I give a 10.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Attending Adobe MAX each year is extremely valuable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online training works well and is not wholly necessary as it is user-friendly and you can learn by doing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation was smooth and easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Canva is a valuable design tool for simple applications, such as creating a social media banner, flyer, or leaflet, particularly for those with no prior design experience. Its use of templates and straightforward tools to add pictures and text makes it a good choice for straightforward tasks. However, if you want to create a publication or designs that are more intricate, then InDesign is the tool for you.
Read full review
I have had problems with other software crashing with large PDF files, except for Adobe. However, Adobe Acrobat is very expensive, and this has done as well for me as Adobe Acrobat. I also dislike monthly fees since income for our business can rise and fall. I prefer to spend the money when I have the income and then not have expenses during the low times.
Read full review
Scalability
Working in a cloud environment makes it easy to scale and share resources.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • A great ROI for time in my small architectural practice, [especially] when a design has been updated and a report needs to be submitted. We can be submitting many reports that all look similar, clean and beautiful. We just save as the file and replace the images with more updated images. This way the client finds it easy to navigate updated reports, as many as they can be.
Read full review
  • Positive: Efficient because it's easy to learn, saving training time.
  • Positive: Adding comments and editing is a breeze, saving peer review hours.
  • Negative: We still have to rely on Acrobat DC to export individual pages into separate PDFs.
Read full review
ScreenShots