Adobe Substance 3D Collection vs. ARSKAN SiloData

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Substance 3D Collection
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Adobe Substance 3D is a suite of apps that support 3D design, including texture assets and rendering tools. Workflows can connect to Adobe Creative Cloud apps.N/A
ARSKAN SiloData
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
ARSKAN SiloData is a platform that allows users to view, use and share 3D models on the web, on the move and without constraints (hardware, bandwidth, latency, external servers). With it, it is possible to generate interactive, collaborative, real-time digital twins that can be connected to all types of databases (IoT, IA, etc.). The software enables users to: upload, store and classify all its 3D models, To invite users and manage their rights through…
$50
per month Par silo (dossier)
Pricing
Adobe Substance 3D CollectionARSKAN SiloData
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Substance 3D CollectionARSKAN SiloData
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNous avons des abonnements par silo (dossier) auxquels on alloue un certains nombres d'objets, d'utilisateurs, d'annotations, etc.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Substance 3D CollectionARSKAN SiloData
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Adobe Substance 3D CollectionARSKAN SiloData
Small Businesses
Autodesk Maya
Autodesk Maya
Score 7.9 out of 10
Autodesk Maya
Autodesk Maya
Score 7.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.0 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Rhino
Rhino
Score 8.8 out of 10
Rhino
Rhino
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe Substance 3D CollectionARSKAN SiloData
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe Substance 3D CollectionARSKAN SiloData
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe
It's great if you don't want to mess around trying fixes or subpar software. Adobe Substance 3D is the default, and it just works when you need it. From textures to complex materials, it gets the job done with no worries. It's really good for new users, because the new UI features they implemented simplify the software a lot, and the learning curve is gentle. It is well suited for game development, renders, and top-notch material creation. One of the main features we use is the creation of dynamic materials that have different colors on the edges. This is useful because it adds a lot of realism, for example, in metals.
Read full review
ARSKAN
No answers on this topic
Pros
Adobe
  • Great performance
  • Excellent Adobe support
  • Fast and easy
Read full review
ARSKAN
No answers on this topic
Cons
Adobe
  • Sometimes, it can take a lot to load heavy files
  • It could be better at the time of exporting, it requires a pro user to make it right
  • The interface can be messy if you're not familiar with it
Read full review
ARSKAN
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Adobe
For texturing, Adobe Substance 3D is much better than the other options. In other fields, it's another story. I find it excellent for game engines and realistic renders, but it only solves textures. We, then, move to Blender because it has more compatibility with exports, and we can import them into our preferred render engine. We mostly use Unreal Engine, but also Blender3D to do the final rendering.
Read full review
ARSKAN
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Adobe
  • We saved time when texturing models
  • With better looking assets, it's more money in the bank
  • Less time testing, more time doing
Read full review
ARSKAN
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

ARSKAN SiloData Screenshots

Screenshot of