The world of work is constantly changing. Agile work processes in particular are becoming increasingly popular. Even large companies are trying to introduce agile working methods. For many, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is the right solution for their agile teams. However, implementing SAFe with all its features such as providing reports, visualizing dependencies and automated documentation is not always easy in reality. Many companies spend a lot of time and money searching for the right…
N/A
Aurea Process
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
Zuri
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Zuri headquartered in Sao Paulo offers a BPMS platform for enterprises, providing a drag and drop process designer and workflow building tool.
N/A
Pricing
Agile Hive
Aurea Process
Zuri
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License
$200,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agile Hive
Aurea Process
Zuri
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Agile Hive
Aurea Process
Zuri
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Agile Hive and Aurea Process and Zuri
Feature
Agile Hive
7.8
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Zuri
-
Ratings
Task Management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Agile Hive and Aurea Process and Zuri
Feature
Agile Hive
10.0
1 Ratings
26% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Zuri
-
Ratings
Velocity Calculation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Agile Hive and Aurea Process and Zuri
Feature
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.3
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Zuri
9.0
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Agile Hive and Aurea Process and Zuri
Feature
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.8
1 Ratings
36% below category average
Zuri
9.3
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Agile Hive and Aurea Process and Zuri
Feature
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
70% below category average
Zuri
9.0
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Social collaboration tools
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Agile Hive and Aurea Process and Zuri
Agile Hive is used for our value train within a SAFe setup. Every quarter we organize a so-called Product Increment (PI) Planning, where we plan all Features and Enablers in Agile Hive. Based on the priority of the Product Manager all teams plan their Features and Enablers accordingly to the sprints that are determined by the Release Train Engineer and set up in Agile Hive. The teams then create User Stories and estimate them and based on their sprint velocity (defined in Agile Hive) Product Owners can see how many Features and Enablers are realistic in one quarter (Product Increment). Further, dependencies across teams can be defined and made visible in Agile Hive, so that the plan is feasible. Without Agile Hive it would be hard or impossible to plan across several teams within a value train and to manage all dependencies. Additionally, with Agile Hive the plan is more realistic, so what can be achieved within one quarter in product development.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workflow automation where you need business resiliency adjusting processes during time to enhance client experience. Zuri is easy. It allows easy updates on stablished (simple and robust!) processes to enhance the workflow. Operations Eficiency gets focus on reducing the human hours and human errors in communications (e-mails), manuals tasks such as spreadsheets and data treatments, all types of repetitive tasks can be automated. Easy, simple and fast by non technical people. Scenarios where you need to automate workflows to ensure qualify and controlling the progresses and productivity of teams, people and organizations. Dashboards and reports specifically created for my own KPIs and goals. I could benefit from more business intelligence, getting my operations data structured (structurated data) and then used Analytics to better understand where and how to improve my operations to: increase client experience, improve profit margins while I was decreasing costs and waist.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It has in general a good usability, but there are some downsides, the big picture view of the entire product increment is too static, so there is no zoom in or zoom out. Mostly throughout planning it is necessary to zoom in to a sprint level and manage the user stories there. Also, the pig picture view has some limitations, because you cannot read the entire user story name (boxes are too small).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
With Jira Software alone it is also possible to plan a SAFe product increment planning, but it would be nearly impossible to see the overall big picture of all product teams involved in a release train. So, the planning on sprint level for one team would be more efficient, but the planning for a whole quarter with all dependencies across teams would be not feasible to present. Therefore, Agile SAFe enables value trains an efficient way to plan a product increment.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We tried other options, saw many demos, some customized, and used some Trials. Zuri was faster and simpler to model processes and activate the automation solutions. Zuri does now require technical knowledge to automate processes. Business people (citizen developers) can easily create their own automations in simple way, in minutes. Despite, Zuri is less expensive. And, it is used by entire organization, not only IT teams. Although IT teams have the governance (full governance and control - including auditing reports ready in clicks) the business people are on the spot too. IT teams use it to accelerate (faster and better, more controlled!) automation solutions (from simple to complex - all with drag and drop feature) the business people (Sales, Marketing, HR, Suppliers, Logistics...) they can easily automate their processes without the waiting time until IT team can deliver what is needed today.
As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Less expensive than other BPMS tools (options), very fast to implement.
Additionally, this is a BPMS tool that is used by all organization, not only IT teams.
Democratized expertise on automation leaving IT team free for more strategic projects rather than creating processes/workflow automation solutions for businesses teams.