Amazon Athena vs. Google Cloud SQL
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Athena | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, customers can point Athena at their data stored in S3 and begin using standard SQL to run ad-hoc queries and get results in seconds. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to setup or manage, and customers pay only for the queries they run. You can use Athena to process logs, perform ad-hoc analysis, and run… | $5 per TB of Data Scanned |
Google Cloud SQL | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud SQL is a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) with the capability and functionality of MySQL. | $0 per core hour |
| Amazon Athena | Google Cloud SQL | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing varies with editions, engine, and settings, including how much storage, memory, and CPU you provision. Cloud SQL offers per-second billing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Athena | Google Cloud SQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 32 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 32 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 32 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 24 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 29 Answers | |
| Amazon Athena | Google Cloud SQL | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Database-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Athena | Google Cloud SQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | MongoDB Atlas Score7.8 out of 10 | MongoDB Atlas Score7.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure Database Score8.8 out of 10 | ![]() Azure Database Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud SQL Score8.7 out of 10 | Google BigQuery Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Athena | Google Cloud SQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 8.6 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.3 |
| Amazon Athena | Google Cloud SQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | Incentivized |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Cloud SQL Screenshots |







