What users are saying about
Top Rated
102 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8.5 out of 100
Based on 102 reviews and ratings
26 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 9 out of 100
Based on 26 reviews and ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon DynamoDB
It is ideal for those projects where you need to store a large amount of data, but you do not know how many will be so you need the database to increase its storage capacity together with the number of users, without having to spend extra money, it also has a great potential thanks to the fast connection it offers, so the data travels at high speed, and this speeds up the performance of the applications, excellent for projects where non-relational databases are used and what matters is to store large quantities of information and use them at high speed.
Software Developer
Globalsoft SolutionsComputer Software, 51-200 employees
CouchDB
Great for REST API development, if you want a small, fast server that will send and receive JSON structures, CouchDB is hard to beat. Not great for enterprise-level relational database querying (no kidding). While by definition, document-oriented databases are not relational, porting or migrating from relational, and using CouchDB as a backend is probably not a wise move as it's reliable, but It may not always be highly available.

Verified User
Engineer in Corporate
Computer Software Company, 1-10 employeesFeature Rating Comparison
NoSQL Databases
Amazon DynamoDB
8.5
CouchDB
7.9
Performance
Amazon DynamoDB
8.7
CouchDB
8.0
Availability
Amazon DynamoDB
9.3
CouchDB
8.5
Concurrency
Amazon DynamoDB
8.7
CouchDB
8.5
Security
Amazon DynamoDB
9.0
CouchDB
6.0
Scalability
Amazon DynamoDB
8.9
CouchDB
8.0
Data model flexibility
Amazon DynamoDB
7.1
CouchDB
7.0
Deployment model flexibility
Amazon DynamoDB
8.1
CouchDB
9.0
Pros
Amazon DynamoDB
- It's very easy to get started, creating a table with a partition/sort key and you're on your way.
- You can scale up and down your read/write IO as needed.
- You can store structured and unstructured data.
- It works great with Web Development as it's JSON based.
Founder, Owner
CodeLinguists LLCComputer Software, 1-10 employees
CouchDB
- It can replicate and sync with web browsers via PouchDB. This lets you keep a synced copy of your database on the client-side, which offers much faster data access than continuous HTTP requests would allow, and enables offline usage.
- Simple Map/Reduce support. The M/R system lets you process terabytes of documents in parallel, save the results, and only need to reprocess documents that have changed on subsequent updates. While not as powerful as Hadoop, it is an easy to use query system that's hard to screw up.
- Sharding and Clustering support. As of CouchDB 2.0, it supports clustering and sharding of documents between instances without needing a load balancer to determine where requests should go.
- Master to Master replication lets you clone, continuously backup, and listen for changes through the replication protocol, even over unreliable WAN links.
Developer
Carrot - a VICE companyBroadcast Media, 201-500 employees
Cons
Amazon DynamoDB
- Complex searching (no support for case-insensitive or full-text search).
- Only supports up to two-key indexes.
- Requires choosing the indexes up-front when doing searches.
- Does not have an SQL compatible query front-end.
- No join-table support (requires putting all data into one table).
VP of Technology
NewstexComputer Software, 1-10 employees
CouchDB
- NoSQL DB can become a challenge for seasoned RDBMS users.
- The map-reduce paradigm can be very demanding for first-time users.
- JSON format documents with Key-Value pairs are somewhat verbose and consume more storage.
Risk Insight Product
TelkomselTelecommunications, 1001-5000 employees
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB 8.7
Based on 34 answers
We will most likely continue to use DynamoDB for certain use-cases. If we stopped using DynamoDB as often, it would likely be because we started using Aurora Serverless more. Aurora Serverless may offer similar availability, management and cost benefits while allowing developers to use their MySQL tools and experience.

Verified User
Engineer in Engineering
Research Company, 11-50 employeesCouchDB
CouchDB 9.0
Based on 9 answers
Because our current solution S3 is working great and CouchDB was a nightmare. The worst is that at first, it seemed fine until we filled it with tons of data and then started to create views and actually delete.
Sr. Software Engineer
PerformicsComputer Software, 201-500 employees
Usability
Amazon DynamoDB
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
CouchDB
CouchDB 8.0
Based on 1 answer
Couchdb is very simple to use and the features are also reduced but well implemented. In order to use it the way its designed, the ui is adequate and easy. Of course, there are some other task that can't be performed through the admin ui but the minimalistic design allows you to use external libraries to develop custom scripts
General Manager
SupermioComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Implementation Rating
Amazon DynamoDB
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
CouchDB
CouchDB 9.0
Based on 2 answers
it support is minimal also hw requirements. Also for development, we can have databases replicated everywhere and the replication is automagical. once you set up the security and the rules for replication, you are ready to go. The absence of a model let you build your app the way you want it
General Manager
SupermioComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Alternatives Considered
Amazon DynamoDB
We evaluated using MongoDB or Amazon DyanmoDB. For us, the biggest advantage is that there's no maintenance cost for Amazon DynamoDB. Mongo gets complicated when you setup sharding. With Amazon DynamoDB, it's literally a push of button to increase throughput. This saves time and money on DevOps resources.

Verified User
Engineer in Engineering
Computer Software Company, 11-50 employeesCouchDB
It has been 5+ years since we chose CouchDB. We looked an MongoDB, Cassandra, and probably some others. At the end of the day, the performance, power potential, and simplicity of CouchDB made it a simple choice for our needs. No one should use just because we did. As I said early, make sure you understand your problems, and find the right solution.Some random reading that might be useful:http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theoremhttps://www.couchbase.com/nosql-resources/why-nosql\https://www.infoq.com/articles/cap-twelve-years-later-how-the-rules-have-changed
CTO & Co-founder
Datawhere.comComputer Software, 11-50 employees
Return on Investment
Amazon DynamoDB
- Since the Amazon manages the instance, the amount of time a developer needs to spend configuring the database is less. For comparison, if we were to manage the same instance manually, we need to set up EC2 instance, install the DB, setup backup scripts, track backup failures, which is a great overhead for the dev. Using DynamoDB this overhead is reduced and hence having a great ROI.
- Great documentation and easy setup makes an easy learning curve to transition to DynamoDB. Only caveat is as with any database, the data structure should be thoroughly analyzed for types of querying because there are limitations with the DynamoDB API.
- Ties very well with rest of the Amazon eco system. Having rest of the applications in Amazon allows managing the application security a breeze.
Application Developer
Monsanto CompanyFarming, 10,001+ employees
CouchDB
- It has saved us hours and hours of coding.
- It is has taught us a new way to look at things.
- It has taught us patience as the first few weeks with CouchDB were not pleasant. It was not easy to pick up like MongoDB.
Chairman & CEO
eDriven StudiosInformation Technology and Services, 1-10 employees
Screenshots
Amazon DynamoDB
CouchDB
—Pricing Details
Amazon DynamoDB
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Amazon DynamoDB Editions & Modules
Edition
On-Demand - Write Operation | $1.251 |
---|---|
On-Demand Read Operation | $0.251 |
On-Demand Data Stored | $0.252 |
On-Demand Point-in-Time Recovery | $0.202 |
On-Demand Snapshot | $0.102 |
On-Demand Restoring a Backup | $0.153 |
On-Demand Global Tables | $1.8754 |
On-Demand Streams | $0.025 |
On-Demand Data Requests Outside AWS Regions | $0.096 |
Provisioned - Write Operation | $0.000657 |
Provisioned - Read Operation | $0.000137 |
Provisioned - Data Stored | $0.258 |
Provisioned - Point-in-Time Recovery | $0.208 |
Provisioned - Snapshot | $0.108 |
Provisioned - Restoring a Backup | $0.159 |
Provisioned - Global Tables | $0.00097510 |
Provisioned - Streams | $0.0211 |
Provisioned - Data Requests Outside AWS Regions | $0.0912 |
- per million requests
- per GB per month
- per GB
- per million write operations replicated
- per 100,000 read operations
- per GB
- capacity unit per hour
- per GB per month
- per GB
- per Read Capacity
- per 100,000 read operations
- per GB
Additional Pricing Details
—CouchDB
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
CouchDB Editions & Modules
—