Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs. IBM Cloud File Storage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources.
$0.04
per GB
IBM Cloud File Storage
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Editions & Modules
US East & West Region
$0.043
per month per GB (One zone)
Europe (Ireland) Region
$0.046
per month per GB (One zone)
Asia Pacific & Canada Region
$0.047
per month per GB (One zone)
Africa (Cape Town) Region
$0.054
per month per GB (One zone)
AWS GovCloud (US-East)
$0.056
per month per GB (One zone)
US East & West Region
$0.08
per month per GB (Standard)
Asia Pacific & Canada Region
$0.09
per month per GB (Standard)
Europe (Ireland) Region
$0.09
per month per GB (Standard)
Africa (Cape Town) Region
$0.10
per month per GB (Standard)
AWS GovCloud (US-East)
$0.11
per month per GB (Standard)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThere is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Considered Both Products
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud File Storage
Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
IBM Cloud File Storage is easier to manage and easier to move on other datacenters to create new workflow. The ecosystem on IBM is more enterprise oriented and math company's customers requirements more than the other 2 providers. In addition we also wanted a different …
Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
In my opinion, IBM has produced excellent products that have been instrumental in the development of our business. We rely heavily on data to power the programs in our organization. Because our systems can be accessed from various apps without experiencing any downtime, …
Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
Yes, we are heavily using the AWS Cloud platform and they have a managed NFS service called Elastic File System (EFS). It workes really well with our HA architecture.
Chose IBM Cloud File Storage
We selected IBM Cloud File Storage because of the company's reputation as a good provider of cloud file storage solutions and more generally, my company at that time relied heavily on IBM software. We hesitated a little bit with Amazon EFS which had some key features that IBM …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)
8.4
3 Ratings
2% above category average
IBM Cloud File Storage
9.1
38 Ratings
10% above category average
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime9.03 Ratings9.336 Ratings
Dynamic scaling9.03 Ratings9.135 Ratings
Elastic load balancing10.03 Ratings9.334 Ratings
Pre-configured templates7.53 Ratings8.930 Ratings
Monitoring tools7.53 Ratings8.836 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images7.03 Ratings8.932 Ratings
Operating system support8.03 Ratings9.235 Ratings
Security controls9.03 Ratings9.436 Ratings
Automation8.52 Ratings9.029 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Small Businesses
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Server - VPC
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Power System Virtual Server
IBM Power System Virtual Server
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM Power System Virtual Server
IBM Power System Virtual Server
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(3 ratings)
9.1
(39 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
8.4
(9 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)IBM Cloud File Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
This tool is very well suited if you want to work in the AWS ecosystem along with other AWS tools as it easily integrates with them. This works very fast for distributed systems. Sometimes, you can face compatibility issues with the operating system so my advice would be to check that before the implementation.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Cloud File Storage is a great tool for integration with your applications, as it has excellent documentation of its api, thus facilitating the development of software that is integrated with it.IBM Cloud File Storage also has high availability, which is vital for our applications, and is easy to configure.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Easy Integration
  • No problem like in RDBMS
  • Cloud script to maintain EFS dynamically
Read full review
IBM
  • Simple file system sharing
  • Lots of storage space (up to 12 TB)
  • Choice of performance (up to 10 IOPS/GB)
  • Simple interface to order more storage
  • Quick interface to allow more servers to share the file store
  • Security - only allows access from specified server(s)
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • EFS could be made highly-available across regions.
  • EFS could be made with a better on-premise extension than Cloud Gateway.
  • EFS could be made to support CIFS/SMB.
Read full review
IBM
  • We have sometimes experienced some outages and hope IBM will fix this soon.
  • Initial trainings are required for the teams to work and do the setup.
  • Support documentation from IBM needs improvement with [the] inclusion of more detailed steps and video tutorials for [a] better understanding of the engineers.
  • The billing process is very complex and you may have to incur additional overhead. Need a simpler approach and clarity on this aspect.
  • Support response from the IBM team is very slow and lacks information.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
The documentation is sufficient for setting up and it is basic NFS for mounting so not much support is required. I have not had any issues to warrant a request with AWS support.
Read full review
IBM
I just had one issue requiring contacting the support. People were very friendly and helpful. I cannot rate better because I have not been exposed to other similar situations (just had one single issue in 6 months), and cannot rate lower because this proves that IBM is trustworthy. I think it is fair.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
If your Team/Company already using AWS and you are building a scalable solution which require API building which connect to a database consist numerous file, then Amazon EFS is definitely must go to tool. which enable the productivity with less maintenance highly compatibility with old system . easy integration and api development.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Cloud File Storage, unlike other similar products, offers excellent Cloud data security and its overall data management quality on IBM Cloud File Storage is incredible and its data integration support is perfect because it allows big data migration across many Cloud platforms for effective data analytics generation and data visualization tools are great.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • This tool is responsible for providing efficiency in multiple aspects.
  • It has a positive impact on the business outcomes.
  • Because of this tool we are having positive impact on customer retention.
Read full review
IBM
  • Compared with company datacenter require less maintenance time with an incomparable high availability and business continuity features
  • The possibility to move snapshots on other data centers let this solution super scalable worldwide
  • The price for gb let us pay what we need without a pre commissioned storage buy
Read full review
ScreenShots