Amazon SageMaker enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.
N/A
Sage X3
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Sage X3 is an ERP solution with a robust range of capabilities supported by collaboration, analytics, and workspace tools.
N/A
TensorFlow
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.
N/A
Pricing
Amazon SageMaker
Sage X3
TensorFlow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon SageMaker
Sage X3
TensorFlow
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon SageMaker
Sage X3
TensorFlow
Features
Amazon SageMaker
Sage X3
TensorFlow
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
7.0
2 Ratings
5% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
5.2
3 Ratings
35% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
5.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
5.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
7.2
4 Ratings
15% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
6.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
5.3
4 Ratings
32% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
5.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
5.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
5.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
6.2
4 Ratings
21% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
7.5
4 Ratings
6% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
6.8
4 Ratings
14% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Pricing
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
6.0
4 Ratings
22% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
6.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
6.7
2 Ratings
4% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
8.3
2 Ratings
11% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
7.2
3 Ratings
3% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
6.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
6.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
7.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
5.7
4 Ratings
19% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
6.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
6.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
6.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
7.3
3 Ratings
1% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
Sage X3
6.9
3 Ratings
4% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
It allows for one-click processes and for things to be auto checked before they are moved through the process but through the system. It also makes training easy. I am able to train users on the basic fundamentals of the tool and how it is used very easily as it is fully managed on its own which is incredible.
I wouldn't suggest this ERP for small organizations, especially if there is no IT staff. While they do offer support packages, they can be costly as certain packages limit the number of times you can call in. Hiring an outside consulting firm to support is another route, however that could become costly as well. Medium to large businesses with savvy tech staff would be a good fit for this ERP.
TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
It's very good for the hardcore programmer, but a little bit complex for a data scientist or new hire who does not have a strong programming background.
Most of the popular library and ML frameworks are there, but we still have to depend on them for new releases.
Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time.
The interface could be a little bit more friendlier and intuitive. Normally end users complain about the ergonomics of the system, even though my experience tells me that is a situation that dilutes itself pretty fast. Another aspect that I think Sage could improve, is the way reports and queries are managed, it seems that at least at some level, there could be a easy drag and drop way (or just by picking fields) to create simple queries/reports. Having to rely on some data base knowledge is not very user friendly. But overall the system is very powerful and a good tool for companies that want to have control over their operations.
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Amazon SageMaker took the heavy lifting out of building and creating models. It allowed for our organization to use our current system for integration and essentially added on a feature to help all levels of Data scientists and IT professionals in our department and company as a whole. The training was simple as well.
Unfortunately, the product was purchased before I began working at the organization. I am unsure what other products they may have reviewed before purchasing Sage ERP X3.
Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice