Anodot vs. BigPanda

In some business scenarios, it found a very uncommon behaviors in our campaigns, in a very detailed granularity (not just campaign level, but also ad group level and much more).

Incentivized

If the organization has a proper CMDB asset record then BigPanda features can be utilized to their true potential as it has alert correlation capability. The alert can be redirected to the proper support team using the auto-share feature. This wouldn't be the case where asset records are not updated and the Operations have to manually assign the alerts to support groups.

Incentivized

• Detects traffic anomalies on time.
• Help us to monitor our PPC campaigns.

Incentivized

• Alert correlation feature helps in grouping similar alerts together
• Alert Enrichment to enhance the data after it arrives on the tool
• Integration with multiple tools
• The console is very user friendly and provides ease of administration

Incentivized

• Anodot sends sometimes some false alarm alerts.

Incentivized

• Tool should have a feature to query the data
• The dashboard feature needs improvement
• It should have a dark mode

Incentivized

We use it widely, across many business departments.

Incentivized

Their support team always answer very fast.

Incentivized

TrueSight didn't provide many customization options. The features provided were primitive as compared to BigPanda. TrueSight was being used just for alert visibility and assignment to a proper support group from a single console. Although Moogsoft had similar features as compared to BigPanda, the user administration and ease of use were a bit complicated. BigPanda provides a much simpler user interface.

Incentivized

• Helped us to find anomalies that would have cost a lot if not detected on time.

Incentivized

• BIgPanda is very easy to implement and use
• Better than the previous tool, provides more functionality
• BIgPanda's alert enrichment feature very helpful

Incentivized