Apache Airflow vs. Azure DevOps Server vs. Broadcom Automic Automation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Apache Airflow is an open source tool that can be used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor data pipelines using Python and SQL.N/A
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
Broadcom Automic Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom Automic Automation (formerly the CA Automic Business Automation Platform)is a workload automation and release / deployment management offering supported by Broadcom, which provides an open, scalable and unified approach to driving automation across, enableing the user to reduce time-to-value and increase business agility by using automation as the backbone of digital transformation.N/A
Pricing
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Features
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
8.7
12 Ratings
5% above category average
Azure DevOps Server
-
Ratings
Broadcom Automic Automation
8.3
4 Ratings
0% below category average
Multi-platform scheduling9.312 Ratings00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
Central monitoring8.912 Ratings00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Logging8.512 Ratings00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.312 Ratings00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.712 Ratings00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Application integration9.412 Ratings00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(12 ratings)
9.0
(48 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(3 ratings)
6.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(10 ratings)
4.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AirflowAzure DevOps ServerBroadcom Automic Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Airflow is well-suited for data engineering pipelines, creating scheduled workflows, and working with various data sources. You can implement almost any kind of DAG for any use case using the different operators or enforce your operator using the Python operator with ease. The MLOps feature of Airflow can be enhanced to match MLFlow-like features, making Airflow the go-to solution for all workloads, from data science to data engineering.
Read full review
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
Broadcom
This product has huge capacity to run millions of jobs per month, can serve to enterprise level of business. If client is looking for platform base solution which can be deployed on-prem or cloud base technologies then this solution works well. It has very good licensing mechanism which is based on number of agents, and there is no limitation of number of jobs run. So client has not to worry on limitation of jobs and can scale of the automation in the environment. This reduced the total cost of ownership of product. Self service automation feature can reduce the client automation cost significantly. it has good batch job coverages from Mainframe to Microservices.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Apache Airflow is one of the best Orchestration platforms and a go-to scheduler for teams building a data platform or pipelines.
  • Apache Airflow supports multiple operators, such as the Databricks, Spark, and Python operators. All of these provide us with functionality to implement any business logic.
  • Apache Airflow is highly scalable, and we can run a large number of DAGs with ease. It provided HA and replication for workers. Maintaining airflow deployments is very easy, even for smaller teams, and we also get lots of metrics for observability.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Wide range of internal functions
  • Many interfaces (incoming and outgoing)
  • Modern, web-based user interface
  • Strong roadmap with topics such as containerisation and AI
  • High throughput possible (> 1 million executions per day)
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • UI/Dashboard can be updated to be customisable, and jobs summary in groups of errors/failures/success, instead of each job, so that a summary of errors can be used as a starting point for reviewing them.
  • Navigation - It's a bit dated. Could do with more modern web navigation UX. i.e. sidebars navigation instead of browser back/forward.
  • Again core functional reorg in terms of UX. Navigation can be improved for core functions as well, instead of discovery.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Could improve the framework.
  • Could improve the underlying coding standards.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
Broadcom
Automic is a very strong Automation Platform which enable us to implement user requirements quickly.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
For its capability to connect with multicloud environments. Access Control management is something that we don't get in all the schedulers and orchestrators. But although it provides so many flexibility and options to due to python , some level of knowledge of python is needed to be able to build workflows.
Read full review
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
Broadcom
I have not used Automic One Automation Platform (formerly CA Automic Automation Platform) support.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Multiple DAGs can be orchestrated simultaneously at varying times, and runs can be reproduced or replicated with relative ease. Overall, utilizing Apache Airflow is easier to use than other solutions now on the market. It is simple to integrate in Apache Airflow, and the workflow can be monitored and scheduling can be done quickly using Apache Airflow. We advocate using this tool for automating the data pipeline or process.
Read full review
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
Broadcom
1. Cost was the major factor without compromising the automation service which this product delivered. Other products are expensive and deliver the same outcome. 2. Limitation of job run, Broadcom Automic Automation allows to run unlimited jobs and helps to increase automation capability. 3. Number of automation packs available with no extra license cost. 4. Depth of coverage of technologies for batch job automation. 5. Required less number of hardware to achieve high availability.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Impact Depends on number of workflows. If there are lot of workflows then it has a better usecase as the implementation is justified as it needs resources , dedicated VMs, Database that has a cost
  • Donot use it if you have very less usecases
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Improved SAP automation thereby giving good returns.
  • Provides mail integration which further widens automation scope and profits.
Read full review
ScreenShots