Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Camel
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Apache Camel is an open source integration platform.N/A
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
SAS Data Management
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
A suite of solutions for data connectivity, enhanced transformations and robust governance. Solutions provide a unified view of data with access to data across databases, data warehouses and data lakes. Connects with cloud platforms, on-premises systems and multicloud data sources.N/A
Pricing
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Considered Multiple Products
Apache Camel

No answer on this topic

Mule ESB
Chose Mule ESB
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
SAS Data Management

No answer on this topic

Features
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
SAS Data Management
8.3
10 Ratings
0% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings00 Ratings8.610 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings00 Ratings8.19 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
SAS Data Management
6.7
8 Ratings
19% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings00 Ratings6.18 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings00 Ratings7.48 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
SAS Data Management
6.7
8 Ratings
16% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings00 Ratings5.56 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.47 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings00 Ratings6.67 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings00 Ratings6.17 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
SAS Data Management
7.9
9 Ratings
1% below category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings00 Ratings7.69 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings00 Ratings8.27 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Boomi
Boomi
Score 7.9 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.9 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.9 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(11 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
7.6
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache CamelMule ESBSAS Data Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Message brokering across different systems, with transactionality and the ability to have fine tuned control over what happens using Java (or other languages), instead of a heavy, proprietary languages. One situation that it doesn't fit very well (as far as I have experienced) is when your workflow requires significant data mapping. While possible when using Java tooling, some other visual data mapping tools in other integration frameworks are easier to work with.
Read full review
Salesforce
If you’re bringing anything into Salesforce you should just invest now into Mule, you will get your money’s worth and find a myriad of uses to build APIs between many other systems. Once you build a component you can easily reuse it as a building block to attach to another source/destination. This makes it easy to ramp up quickly and spread usage of Mule throughout your enterprise. A good value for medium to large companies, but probably cheaper to outsource your job to a consulting firm if you are smaller.
Read full review
SAS
When data is in a system that needs a complex transformation to be usable for an average user. Such tasks as data residing in systems that have very different connection speeds. It can be integrated and used together after passing through the SAS Data Integration Studio removing timing issues from the users' worries. A part that is perhaps less appropriate is getting users who are not familiar with the source data to set up the load processes.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel.
  • There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported.
  • Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix.
  • There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms.
  • Camel is also good for creating microservices.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It is best suited for Rest API development. Mule ESB uses RAML as an API descriptor which is less complex and easy to understand. RAML is an open standard majorly supported by Mulesoft. Once RAML is developed, it is very easy (a few clicks)to create flows corresponding to the resources defined in the RAML. One can also include JSON schema validation in RAML, and with the use of APIkit router, Mule ESB makes the request validation very easy (it's automatic basically.)
  • Mule ESB comes with a large spectrum of community and enterprise connectors. We have connectors for all the major platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, SAP, etc. This enables Mule ESB to integrate with the other systems in a faster and more robust way. Mule ESB has many components to fulfill the requirements of each integration (for example batch processing, parallel processing, choice, etc.)
  • Mule API gateway is one of the best tools (modules) of Mulesoft's offering. It supports API governance and management very well. One can easily enforce policies on their APIs with API gateway. It enables some of the must-have features in an API solution (i.e. throttling, oAuth, access levels, etc.)
  • Implementing a CI/CD (DevOps) environment for Mule ESB is a very easy task. Mule majorly uses MAVEN as its build tool, which in turn makes it best suitable for CI/CD approach. Mule also provides MAVEN plugins for auto deployments to the servers. Mule also has a best Unit testing module which is MUnit. MUnit can be used for both Unit and Functional testing, and it is easy to write and generates coverage reports in various formats.
Read full review
SAS
  • SAS/Access is great for manipulating large and complex databases.
  • SAS/Access makes it easy to format reports and graphics from your data.
  • Data Management and data storage using the Hadoop environment in SAS/Access allows for rapid analysis and simple programming language for all your data needs.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • didn't work well when our developers tried to transform heavy data sets
  • Apache Camel's whole logic is based on java so team needs to have a great skill set in java
  • if there are a handful of workflows then Apache Camel's full potential can't be realized
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Make sure to not over-engineer shared components. It can complicate development
  • Create a roadmap for where you are going - if not, you may miss components
  • I suggest getting support, otherwise it could be a difficult learning curve
Read full review
SAS
  • Requires third-party drivers to connect to common data sources like SFDC, MS SQL, Postgres.
  • Debugging errors from the logs is a complicated process.
  • E-mail alert system is very primitive and needs customization to make it more modern,
  • Cannot send SMS alerts for jobs.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
SAS
We are happy with the software and its functionality. As a SAS-shop, DataFlux is a logical choice for complex data integration.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
SAS
The main negative point is the use of a non-standard language for customizations, as well as the poor integration with non-SAS systems. However, there is no doubt that it is a high-performance and powerful product capable of responding optimally to certain requirements.
Read full review
Performance
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
SAS
It worked as expected.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
SAS
With SAS, you pay a license fee annually to use this product. Support is incredible. You get what you pay for, whether it's SAS forums on the SAS support site, technical support tickets via email or phone calls, or example documentation. It's not open source. It's documented thoroughly, and it works.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
If you are looking for a Java-based open source low cost equivalent to webMethods or Azure Logic Apps, Apache Camel is an excellent choice as it is mature and widely deployed, and included in many vendored Java application servers too such as Redhat JBoss EAP. Apache Camel is lacking on the GUI tooling side compared to commercial products such as webMethods or Azure Logic Apps.
Read full review
Salesforce
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
Read full review
SAS
Because of ease of using SAS DI and data processing speed. There were lots of issues with AWS Redshift on cloud environment in terms of making connections with the data sources and while fetching the data we need to write complex queries.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Very fast time to market in that so many components are available to use immediately.
  • Error handling mechanisms and patterns of practice are robust and easy to use which in turn has made our application more robust from the start, so fewer bugs.
  • However, testing and debugging routes is more challenging than working is standard Java so that takes more time (less time than writing the components from scratch).
  • Most people don't know Camel coming in and many junior developers find it overwhelming and are not enthusiastic to learn it. So finding people that want to develop/maintain it is a challenge.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Overall a great tool for complex integrations
Read full review
SAS
  • We have more users who can connect to the many different data sources.
  • Our users do have existing SAS programming knowledge and that can carry over.
  • Business functions are starting to rely on SAS Data Integration Studio work product shortly after introduction.
Read full review
ScreenShots