Apache CloudStack vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
CloudStack is a cloud management platform, from Apache.N/A
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Apache CloudStackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudStackRed Hat JBoss EAP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache CloudStackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Features
Apache CloudStackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Apache CloudStack
-
Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
6.8
9 Ratings
16% below category average
IDE support00 Ratings6.09 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings5.09 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache CloudStackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache CloudStackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(3 ratings)
8.1
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache CloudStackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Whether our clients are VPS hosting providers or operate private cloud infrastructure for their internal enterprise requirements, CloudStack provides solutions in an easy to implement and operate way that is simple to provide training for. The learning curve for our customesr adopting CloudStack for the management of their cloud infrastructure is shallow, enabling our clients to come up to speed quickly without having to outsource their administrative functions any longer than necessary
Read full review
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Low-cost solution
  • Open-source
  • Engaged community
  • Solid documentation
  • Is a very reliable tool for orchestration with good usability
Read full review
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Sometimes you can find undocumented bugs that can compromise the entire infrastructure.
  • [If] you don't have an official support channel, you have try to find out the source of the problem by yourself.
  • Volume size limitation. Other players allow you to create volumes up to 64TB while ACS allows only 2TB volumes
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
  • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
  • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Usability
Apache
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Performance
Apache
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
The University, my first large implementation, had a big issue with 149 small data centers spread on São Paulo State, this data centers costs to university were very high, the consolidation idea in two data centers were awesome, but were worried with the management, so we adopted ACS to management of all 576 physical hosts. Now a days the university is delivering IaaS for all staff, students, teachers and researchers, they are using these resources to delivery services to their clients and have a great results in research area
Read full review
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Low-cost solution (free and open-source)
  • More than 2000 users using it simultaneously
  • Stable and reliable
  • Up and running since 2012
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
ScreenShots