Apache Lucene vs. IBM Watson Discovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Lucene
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Lucene is an open source and free text search engine library written in Java. It is a technology suitable for applications that requires full-text search, and is available cross-platform.
$0
per month
IBM Watson Discovery
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM offers Watson Discovery, a natural language processing (NLP) application with options to measure sentiment, detect entities, semantic roles, and other concepts.N/A
Pricing
Apache LuceneIBM Watson Discovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache LuceneIBM Watson Discovery
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsA free and open source product.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache LuceneIBM Watson Discovery
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Apache LuceneIBM Watson Discovery
Small Businesses
Yext
Yext
Score 9.0 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.2 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.2 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache LuceneIBM Watson Discovery
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(3 ratings)
9.3
(26 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache LuceneIBM Watson Discovery
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Apache Lucene is a perfect text search implementation where the heap space usage needs to be kept to its minimal. It also enables search based on various search fields and most importantly the search and index process can happen simultaneously. The only scenario where it might be less appropriate would be when the index size grows too big. We have witnessed few scalable issues where the search would take a while when the index size is too large.
Read full review
IBM
Companies with a strong IT foundation looking for data-driven insights and efficient data analysis tools should give IBM Watson Discovery top consideration. It is a great instrument for making decisions, combining several data sources and offering insights motivated by artificial intelligence. Also, its personalizing tools let us maximize models for our specific study requirements.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • We found Apache Lucene to be extremely performant in querying large amounts of data and retrieving the correct files based on the metadata provided.
  • The online community offers great support for the product. Even though it is an open source tool, it is not difficult to find help online for it.
  • When we were creating a proof of concept application, we found that the software worked just as well, while being run locally on a resource-limited PC.
Read full review
IBM
  • Searching through big collections of documents has never been easier thanks to Discovery's ability to identify, classify, profile, tag, and even split documents to allow for optimized search results.
  • IBM Watson Discovery is by far the go-to tool for mining data collections and getting deeper insights, thanks to the recent release of the Data Miner feature and its amazing graphic interface.
  • Another thing Discovery does well is the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Smart Document Understanding (SDU) features to train and learn the structures of documents which makes it super easy to find and highlight answers to complex questions.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • User interface for setup and maintenance would be helpful.
  • Easier cloud/cluster setup.
  • Better, centralized documentation.
Read full review
IBM
  • I believe AI should be more flexible about providing data. However, it's understandable that you need to provide the details you need in a more specific and detailed way.
  • The interface could use more tweaking. Being new to the program, it was kind of hard to navigate.
  • Luckily, there was a customized feature of the dashboard that I could set up, and having something that you know where you are placed always feels familiar and comfortable.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM Watson Discovery has the best user capabilities and easily transform business decision-making portfolio. The automation system saves time used in data analysis as opposed to manual research that consumes a lot of time. The visualization across the dashboard enables my team to interpret complex data and use it to make reliable marketing decisions.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
Similar to all IBM Watson and Salesforce product solutions, the overall support would be a 10/10. Their provided FAQ's help with frequently experienced issues and if still unable to figure something out, their customer service representatives are always super responsive. With instant chat functions available, it is easy to ask a quick question rather than sitting on hold.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
The search and index performance of [Apache] Lucene is excellent and the quality of results is good, if not better. For implementing it with small scale applications it is a no brainer, Lucene is the best and most cost effective solution. Learning curve is not too steep either.
Read full review
IBM
Discovery differs from its competitors due to the better ease of implementation and the high level of natural language recognition, it is equal in integration resources such as API and workflow or process pipeline, but it loses in the price for a high volume of documents and/or research. If you own or plan to use other services from the IBM Watson family, there is no doubt that Watson discovery is your best option. Another important point is if you plan to use a cloud or on-premise service (local server or private cloud).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Being an open source project we did not have to pay any licensing fees for using Apache Lucene. It has greatly improved our search functionality in our web apps.
Read full review
IBM
  • We find its Enterprise plan expensive for a country of LATAM. For US or Europe based businesses, looks great.
  • A Big Data and massive queries based company would find the service expensive. Maybe a flat price plan would be helpful.
  • Have you thought in making a cheaper plan where you take the learning from your customer's data to enrich your AI tool?
Read full review
ScreenShots

Apache Lucene Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of