Apache Solr vs. Netcore Unbxd

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Solr
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Apache Solr is an open-source enterprise search server.N/A
Netcore Unbxd
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Unbxd is a search platform that enables ecommerce businesses to engage their shoppers by building contextual relevancy into what they are searching for. It converts shoppers more often and faster by showing them genuine results.N/A
Pricing
Apache SolrNetcore Unbxd
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache SolrNetcore Unbxd
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache SolrNetcore Unbxd
Considered Both Products
Apache Solr
Chose Apache Solr
We tryed to promote Redis as cache solution for application, in order to replace Apache Solr, but it won't go well. Redis best pratices requires some more computer resources. With Elastic Search, the use case was another, and don't compete with Apache Solr.
Chose Apache Solr
Apache Solr is a ready-to-use product addressing specific use cases such as keyword searches from a huge set of data documents.
Chose Apache Solr
We have considering AWS search and Elastic search but decide to go with Solr as we need high speed and flexible query, and so far it meets all our requirement so we still continue with Solr.
Chose Apache Solr
We tried to use both Elasticsearch and Swiftype with Drupal 8 but there are currently no good modules that integrate Drupal with those solutions. So Solr was really the only option for a Drupal 8 web site. It's not as easy to learn or use as Swiftype, but in the end I think it …
Chose Apache Solr
Before using Solr, we used a self-made search engine. Solr has helped us increase our capacity to serve our customers the results they are looking for easily without breaking down. Our previous platform was not dynamic enough to accommodate our growing traffic or smart enough …
Chose Apache Solr
Azure Search is not as mature as Apache Solr at this point. So the range of query flexibility is less than Solr. Also, when indexing content goes beyond 1 TB, it might become costly for Azure Search.
Chose Apache Solr
Between Solr and ElasticSearch, there is a constant struggle to pick the best one. ElasticSearch is part of ELK and ties in well with LogStash and Kibana which makes it great for logs and big data stuff. Add some logs and see which works best for your particular access methods …
Chose Apache Solr
We switched from search indexes stored in mysql to soar and it's made a world of difference for our growing businesses. The relational databases are very poor for handling the complex data searches require and Solr delivered all the tools we need to get the performance our end …
Chose Apache Solr
Apache Solr in general stacks up very well to its competitors, it provides much of the same features and performance and has the benefits of being an open-source project with an active contributor base that works consistently and improves the platform. Depending on your setup …
Chose Apache Solr
Some people on my team tried MondoDB and had several problems (don't remember which ones).

Elasticsearch would be a good choice but we didn't have it in our minds when we made the choice.
Netcore Unbxd
Chose Netcore Unbxd
They have some good graphics and displays for overall reports. Reports and data analytics reports are having good insights into all the data. The reports are enough to calculate each time series analysis.
Best Alternatives
Apache SolrNetcore Unbxd
Small Businesses
Yext
Yext
Score 7.5 out of 10
Yext
Yext
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.3 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.3 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache SolrNetcore Unbxd
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache SolrNetcore Unbxd
Likelihood to Recommend
Very effective for end-user searching applications and for generating search results. Also very well suited to those looking for high reliability and performance. If [you're doing] fuzzy searching or if you are working on a smaller end-user application or an internal application that does not require high performance and flexible/adapting searching then it may not be necessary to use Solr.
Read full review
Best scenarios: To explain to the customers how the product works in searching any operation and to give the demo to customers. Less appropriate: To describe the customers in a very short span of time.
Read full review
Pros
  • Faceted navigation and field collapsing/grouping : filtering and quick results were what we needed for our websites. Our customers needed to have this functionalities for good and efficient results.
  • We tested them with our customers' registered searches (they received all new goods matching with their registered searches by emails and/or mobile push). Results were incredible by comparison with our old system (old MySQL requests).
  • Note : we didn't put all our data in Solr. Just what we need for searching uses. Other data stayed in our MySQL database.
  • Auto-suggest : our old auto-suggest wasn't performing well. With Apache Solr, our new one was worked really well ! The suggestions came quickly and suggestions were good.
  • We also extended auto-suggestion with geo-spatial data and it worked well.
  • Hit highlighting : we used this functionality and we didn't have problem and nasty surprise.
  • Keep all data status during data upgrading (see next details for improvements)
Read full review
  • Auto suggest widgets
  • Visual workbench
  • A/B testing
Read full review
Cons
  • Ease of use -- this is not always the easier platform to configure.
  • Developer Community -- There are not a whole lot of folks out there that understand this stuff so finding talent is difficult.
  • Drupal 8 -- We've been frustrated with slow development on APIs for Drupal 8 integration.
Read full review
  • Animated toons
  • Some short video explanations
  • Fast and ready suggestions
Read full review
Usability
It takes some time to deploy and currectly maintein it. And also, to learn how to use and integrate in the enviroment as well. Once you get theses steps done, it usability is very simple, and almost of the time it don't require no further attention on it. Even for maintence, if you deploy it on a cluster mode, it is very reliable and easy to take one host down.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We switched from search indexes stored in MySQL to soar and it's made a world of difference for our growing businesses. The relational databases are very poor for handling the complex data searches require and Solr delivered all the tools we need to get the performance our end users are demanding.
Read full review
They have some good graphics and displays for overall reports. Reports and data analytics reports are having good insights into all the data. The reports are enough to calculate each time series analysis.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's enabled us to deliver fast, relevant search results on our new website. The site is still in beta and being actively developed so our complete ROI is still unknown.
  • It integrates very well with Drupal so it has saved us from having to develop a custom solution.
Read full review
  • Positive impact: Reports , Speed of report generation.
  • Negative feature: AI feature : sometimes it didn't work.
Read full review
ScreenShots