TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Spark

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AApache Spark is an open-source, distributed cluster-computing framework designed for large-scale data processing, batch transformations, real-time Streaming Analytics, and machine learning workloads. The platform executes distributed memory-centric computations across heterogeneous storage layers using unified APIs in Python, Scala, Java, SQL, and R.N/A

    AWS Lambda

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAWS Lambda is a serverless computing platform that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. With Lambda, users can run code for virtually any type of app or backend service—all with zero administration. It takes of requirements to run and scale code with high availability.

    $NaN

    Per 1 ms

    Pricing
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    128 MB
    $0.0000000021
    Per 1 ms
    1024 MB
    $0.0000000167
    Per 1 ms
    10240 MB
    $0.0000001667
    Per 1 ms
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose Apache Spark
    We specifically choose Spark over MapReduce to make the cluster processing faster
    Incentivized
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    24 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    Features
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Apache Spark and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Apache Spark
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.57 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Apache Spark and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Apache Spark
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    4.9
    6 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings5.46 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings5.05 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings4.35 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of Apache Spark and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Apache Spark
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Programming Language Diversity00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration00 Ratings9.17 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (24 ratings)
    7.5
    (52 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.3
    (17 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache SparkAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Well suited: To most of the local run of datasets and non-prod systems - scalability is not a problem at all. Including data from multiple types of data sources is an added advantage. MLlib is a decently nice built-in library that can be used for most of the ML tasks. Less appropriate: We had to work on a RecSys where the music dataset that we used was around 300+Gb in size. We faced memory-based issues. Few times we also got memory errors. Also the MLlib library does not have support for advanced analytics and deep-learning frameworks support. Understanding the internals of the working of Apache Spark for beginners is highly not possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Lambda excels at event-driven, short-lived tasks, such as processing files or building simple APIs. However, it's less ideal for long-running, computationally intensive, or applications that rely on carrying the state between jobs. Cold starts and constant load can easily balloon the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Rich APIs for data transformation making for very each to transform and prepare data in a distributed environment without worrying about memory issues
    • Faster in execution times compare to Hadoop and PIG Latin
    • Easy SQL interface to the same data set for people who are comfortable to explore data in a declarative manner
    • Interoperability between SQL and Scala / Python style of munging data
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
    • Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
    • Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Memory management. Very weak on that.
    • PySpark not as robust as scala with spark.
    • spark master HA is needed. Not as HA as it should be.
    • Locality should not be a necessity, but does help improvement. But would prefer no locality
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Developing test cases for Lambda functions can be difficult. For functions that require some sort of input it can be tough to develop the proper payload and event for a test.
    • For the uninitiated, deploying functions with Infrastructure as Code tools can be a challenging undertaking.
    • Logging the output of a function feels disjointed from running the function in the console. A tighter integration with operational logging would be appreciated, perhaps being able to view function logs from the Lambda console instead of having to navigate over to CloudWatch.
    • Sometimes its difficult to determine the correct permissions needed for Lambda execution from other AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    Capacity of computing data in cluster and fast speed.
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Apache
    If the team looking to use Apache Spark is not used to debug and tweak settings for jobs to ensure maximum optimizations, it can be frustrating. However, the documentation and the support of the community on the internet can help resolve most issues. Moreover, it is highly configurable and it integrates with different tools (eg: it can be used by dbt core), which increase the scenarios where it can be used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    I give it a seven is usability because it's AWS. Their UI's are always clunkier than the competition and their documentation is rather cumbersome. There's SO MUCH to dig through and it's a gamble if you actually end up finding the corresponding info if it will actually help. Like I said before, going to google with a specific problem is likely a better route because AWS is quite ubiquitous and chances are you're not the first to encounter the problem. That being said, using SAM (Serverless application model) and it's SAM Local environment makes running local instances of your Lambdas in dev environments painless and quite fun. Using Nodejs + Lambda + SAM Local + VS Code debugger = AWESOME.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    1. It integrates very well with scala or python. 2. It's very easy to understand SQL interoperability. 3. Apache is way faster than the other competitive technologies. 4. The support from the Apache community is very huge for Spark. 5. Execution times are faster as compared to others. 6. There are a large number of forums available for Apache Spark. 7. The code availability for Apache Spark is simpler and easy to gain access to. 8. Many organizations use Apache Spark, so many solutions are available for existing applications.
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon consistently provides comprehensive and easy-to-parse documentation of all AWS features and services. Most development team members find what they need with a quick internet search of the AWS documentation available online. If you need advanced support, though, you might need to engage an AWS engineer, and that could be an unexpected (or unwelcome) expense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Spark in comparison to similar technologies ends up being a one stop shop. You can achieve so much with this one framework instead of having to stitch and weave multiple technologies from the Hadoop stack, all while getting incredibility performance, minimal boilerplate, and getting the ability to write your application in the language of your choosing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Lambda is good for short running functions, and ideally in response to events within AWS. Google App Engine is a more robust environment which can have complex code running for long periods of time, and across more than one instance of hardware. Google App Engine allows for both front-end and back-end infrastructure, while AWS Lambda is only for small back-end functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Business leaders are able to take data driven decisions
    • Business users are able access to data in near real time now . Before using spark, they had to wait for at least 24 hours for data to be available
    • Business is able come up with new product ideas
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive - Only paying for when code is run, unlike virtual machines where you pay always regardless of processing power usage.
    • Positive - Scalability and accommodating larger amounts of demand is much cheaper. Instead of scaling up virtual machines and increasing the prices you pay for that, you are just increasing the number of times your lambda function is run.
    • Negative - Debugging/troubleshooting, and developing for lambda functions take a bit more time to get used to, and migrating code from virtual machines and normal processes to Lambda functions can take a bit of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots