Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Virtual Networking

It is best suited for larger companies with lots of remote workers that need complex access management. We've barely scratched the surface on what Appgate can do via its API.

Incentivized

Nutanix Flow is working well for micro segmentation of out network traffic between system in our Nutanix environment

Incentivized

• Software-Defined perimeter
• Hide resources to non-authorized/authenticated users.

Incentivized

• Live logging in the client. Currently you have to "download" the logs into a zip file and then open that zipfile to look at the logs. There's no logfile to tail or watch.
• Load balancing between controllers could be better. Currently relies on round robin DNS and sometimes a browser will pick a different IP than previous and you'll get a big "LOST CONNECTION TO CONTROLLER" message.

Incentivized

The company has been supportive overall of our needs and desired features. I have not personally called the support services, but I've heard no direct complaints either.

Incentivized

The existing system was FortiGate. The management of the system was a hassle. Because IT personnel had to manually create VPN accounts, user passwords were known to who created them and the end user did not have a way to change them. This created a security issue in the event an IT engineer left the company.

Incentivized

• We are achieving our goals with this tool by hiding resources behind it.
• It is a new model that requires a different thought process for many in network operations.

Incentivized