TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Appium

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AAppium is an open-source, cross-platform UI test automation framework governed by the OpenJS Foundation. Designed to automate user interface testing across mobile, web, desktop, and smart TV applications, Appium provides a W3C WebDriver-compatible protocol that enables developers and QA engineers to write test scripts against native, hybrid, and web applications without modifying source code or bundling proprietary testing SDKs.N/A

    TestMu AI

    Score8.8 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    TestMu AI is a cloud-based Automated Testing, Software Testing, and Performance Testing platform engineered to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality across web, mobile, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Positioned as an enterprise quality engineering alternative to platforms such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and Katalon, the system combines multi-framework test execution with autonomous AI testing agents. TestMu AI executes Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and Appium…

    $19

    per month per user

    Pricing
    AppiumTestMu AI
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Virtual Live
    $19
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device Plus Live
    $49
    per month 1 parallel test
    Test Manager
    $59
    per month per seat
    Web Automation on Desktop
    $99
    per month Parallel Test
    Virtual Automation Cloud
    $159
    per month Parallel Test
    HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
    $199
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device + Automation Cloud
    $249
    per month Parallel Test
    SmartUI Visual Regression
    $269
    per month Parallel Test
    Kane AI (Mobile + Web)
    $349
    per month Parallel Test
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Parallel Test
    HyperExecute On-Premise
    Custom Pricing
    per parallel test
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AppiumTestMu AI
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AppiumTestMu AI
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    TestMu AI
    Chose TestMu AI
    Its excellent userfriendly interface makes it easier to the user. Top notch execution stability of the testing steps and saves it. Instead of browser it reduces the execution time of the testcase. Its price is also affordable any client of user can buy it. It has cross OS …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    105 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    99 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    107 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    89 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    AppiumTestMu AI
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AppiumTestMu AI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    9.0
    (119 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (71 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AppiumTestMu AI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
    • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
    • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
    • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
    • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
    • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
    • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
    • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Open Source
    I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    yes always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    haven't found any glitch while using this
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    not all department, but we're using for our clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
    • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
    • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
    • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
    • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    TestMu AI Screenshots

    Screenshot of An automated screenshot.Screenshot of Mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Some of the available integrations.Screenshot of Real-time testingScreenshot of Responsive testing