Handy Tool
Overall Satisfaction with LambdaTest
I'm using LambdaTest for automation testing and cross-browser compatibility testing. The tool stands out with its intuitive user interface (UI) and user
experience (UX), which significantly improves productivity. Compared to
other testing tools I have tried, LambdaTest offers a more seamless and
satisfactory user experience. Real-time device testing has made my job easier. I'm still using this tool effortlessly now.
experience (UX), which significantly improves productivity. Compared to
other testing tools I have tried, LambdaTest offers a more seamless and
satisfactory user experience. Real-time device testing has made my job easier. I'm still using this tool effortlessly now.
Pros
- Cross-browser compatibility testing
- Real-time device testing
- Automation testing
Cons
- Lags a bit
- Team collaboration
- More automation testing features
- Productivity
- Less Stress
I feel that the UI and UX of BrowserStack are not on par with LambdaTest.
Do you think LambdaTest delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with LambdaTest's feature set?
Yes
Did LambdaTest live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of LambdaTest go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy LambdaTest again?
Yes
Using LambdaTest
3 - Software Testing
3 - QA Skills
- Real-time device testing
- Browser testing
- Compatibility Testing
- CI/CD Pipeline Integration
- Collaborative Debugging
- Load Testing
- Bug Tracking Integration
- Parallel Test Execution
- Accessibility Testing
Evaluating LambdaTest and Competitors
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
Will look for ease to use tool
LambdaTest Implementation
- Implemented in-house
- Third-party professional services
for my client
- Requirement Changes
- Resource Constraints
- Technical Challenges
LambdaTest Training
- No Training
yes easy to use
Configuring LambdaTest
Not really - everything is there in the documentation
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
LambdaTest Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed Quick Initial Response | None |
Yes because we're using this for our client projects
During a critical phase of our product testing cycle, we encountered a
complex issue with cross-browser compatibility that was delaying our
release schedule. I reached out to LambdaTest for support
complex issue with cross-browser compatibility that was delaying our
release schedule. I reached out to LambdaTest for support
Using LambdaTest
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Quick to learn Feel confident using | Cumbersome |
- Live Interactive Testing
- Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
- Cross-Device Testing
- Testing Non-Web Applications
- Localhost or Internal Network Testing Without Setup
- Heavy Load Testing
Not Sure - Verry
LambdaTest Reliability
Integrating LambdaTest
- CI/CD Tools
- GitHub
- Jira
it was not very difficult
- Selenium
- Azure DevOps
- Trello
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
- ETL tools
Please read out the configuration docs and integration will be done easily


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation