TestMu AI is a cloud-based Automated Testing, Software Testing, and Performance Testing platform engineered to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality across web, mobile, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Positioned as an enterprise quality engineering alternative to platforms such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and Katalon, the system combines multi-framework test execution with autonomous AI testing agents. TestMu AI executes Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and Appium…
Because it has everything we need for test management. The availability of virtual devices for mobile tests is great. When a new cellphone is on the market it is available in a matter of weeks. It has a great test manager and a great support. The price could be better, but it …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose TestMu AI
i checked demo of both browserstack and LamdaTest and i found LambdaTest to be more easy to use and its simpler yet informative UI and ease of selecting multipel devices to use was the goto solution for me to choose LamdaTest
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose TestMu AI
For less money, you get premium features as IP Geo location. In our case it was the decision factor to go with TestMu AI, in our case we have a tight budget that didn't allow to go with other cloud device vendors. It has been great the balance between offered features and price
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
SDET in Quality Assurance at Direct ferries (Leisure, Travel & Tourism, 51-200 employees)
Chose TestMu AI
It was a choice out of my hands as based upon budget, but overall the products are very similar, I understand that LambdaTest offers a cheaper option providing the same functionality
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Quality Assurance Engineer in Information Technology at Technobot System Pvt Ltd (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees)
Chose TestMu AI
The reason I have selected LambdaTest is that earlier I have used BrowserStack in my workflow, but when I got to know from the industry expert about LambdaTest, then I explored it on my own, and I found that it's a very cost-effective and slightly more flexible for our project …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Shopify Developer in Engineering at Zestard Technologies (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees)
Chose TestMu AI
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Web Developer in Engineering at Bubba Ai (Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, 51-200 employees)
Chose TestMu AI
What I love most about LambdaTest is the real-time device testing. It makes it so much easier to spot specific issues across different devices, something that's usually tough when you don’t have access to a full range of physical devices. So as compare to the competitors it …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Senior Full Stack Developer in Engineering at Amperative (Computer Software, 11-50 employees)
Chose TestMu AI
LambdaTest has been a better choice because these platforms lack in many features like the third party integration, availability of number of devices, and most importantly its quicker than all and thats the most important aspect which led to switch LambdaTest, They also provide …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose TestMu AI
I find LambdaTest interface clean and understandable, and team support is also fast which is best.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose TestMu AI
The thing which I like about LambdaTest is it has wide range of devices for both platforms Android as well as iOS, which makes testing a lot easier without actually owning those devices. We can also set different custom configuration for devices which help in testing the edge …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sr Technology consultant in Information Technology at PwC (Computer & Network Security, 10,001+ employees)
Chose TestMu AI
We have used all the products in past but in LambdaTest they are providing all the facility and features in a single application which is really helpful for an organization. Apart from their support during the deploying and customized features for organization specifi makes it …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose TestMu AI
AWS Device Farm does not come close to LambdaTest in terms of capability and user expereince in mobile devices testing. Device farm lags a lot and device model updates are slower when compared to LambdaTest.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
