Artsyl ClaimAction vs. Therabill by WebPT

For smaller clinics who see fewer numbers of patients or rarely deal with claim denials, Therabill by WebPT would be satisfactory and effective for use. However, because the workflows for handling claim denials and for entering batch payments can be so tedious, difficult, and time-consuming, I would not recommend the suite for businesses with greater quantities of daily claims or complex billing scenarios.

Incentivized

• Great integration with WebPT
• Love the auto posting of patient payments when we apply ERAs - and the ability to not apply if there is a secondary.
• The Patient statements are pretty easy to send out. Love that we have options to print or email them.
• The zendesk site answers a LOT of questions and is a fantastic resource.

Incentivized

• Customer Services is hit or miss
• Payments sometimes applied incorrectly
• Lack of Guidance for set up

Incentivized

We are actually looking at other options - unsure whether we will continue

Incentivized

The UI is fairly user-friendly and finding what you need on the site isn't that difficult. Once set up, EDI and ERA receipt works smoothly and payment posting from ERAs is straightforward and simple for the most part. But handling claim denials, corrections, and resubmissions is incredibly difficult. It is not only difficult to find and sort them, but to send them out for reprocessing as well.

Incentivized

Chat is great but often not working or very slow responses. Can't easily talk to a person about issues and emails are very slow to get answered

Incentivized

WebPT helps with all record keeping, compliance and note taking while therabill helps with making billing easy to perform and track.

Incentivized

• Increased ease with financials year over year
• easy to track profits
• easy to track busy seasons

Incentivized