Assembla vs. Plastic SCM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Assembla
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Assembla provides a cloud-based source code management (SCM) Platform that covers Perforce, Apache Subversion (SVN), and Git. Their managed cloud hosting solutions are designed for both small and enterprise software development teams. They offer a turn-key cloud hosting solution that covers both Perforce and infrastructure management. This includes design and managed dedicated server network. And Assembla's Subversion Enterprise offers Assembla Cloud features on a dedicated, high-performance…
$19
per month per user
Plastic SCM
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with: Branch explorer Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic) On-premises and cloud repo management Code review mergebots (last mile…
$6.95
per user
Pricing
AssemblaPlastic SCM
Editions & Modules
Subversion Cloud
$19
per month per user
Perforce Cloud
$52.25
per month (12 month term) per user
Perforce Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Subversion Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Cloud Edition
$6.95
per user
Team Edition (on prem)
$9.95
per user
Enterprise Edition
$23.25
per user
Enterprise Edition (perpetual)
$595.00
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AssemblaPlastic SCM
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AssemblaPlastic SCM
Best Alternatives
AssemblaPlastic SCM
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.3 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AssemblaPlastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(2 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
AssemblaPlastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend
Idera, Inc.
Assembla works well when you are working with multiple groups or entities. We dealt with different time zones, different levels of involvement with the projects, etc so this allows for us to have responses back in a quicker fashion. It also helps us clue in the appropriate people and rely less on following multiple email chains
Read full review
Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient
Read full review
Pros
Idera, Inc.
  • Assembla assists in the workload balancing of our programmers.
  • We are able to use Assembla to manage sprints and sprint planning in our agile format.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
  • Version Control
  • Organizing Workflow
  • Transparency
Read full review
Cons
Idera, Inc.
  • The ability to export the tasks or run metrics on them.
  • Mobile ability.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
  • Interface
  • Documentation
  • Learning curve
  • Unity integration
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Idera, Inc.
We selected Assembla because the ticket functionality worked well with our agile planning format that we use company wide.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Idera, Inc.
  • We were able to spend less time tracking down the status of projects.
  • We could become more self-sufficient on reviewing prior resolutions to help with current problems.
  • Tasks were responded to quickly because we did not have to email one person, wait for an out of office email and then try someone else. Our task got assigned to the next available person.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
  • Easy to use
  • Cheap
  • Better than git for us
  • Artists love it
Read full review
ScreenShots

Plastic SCM Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of