ATOmate vs. Oracle BPM Suite

ATOmate has automated so many processes and we are now able to assign staff to more meaningful tasks rather than sorting out paper documents.

In saying that, there are times when manual intervention is required like sending out a big payment required.

Incentivized

Oracle BPM is part of [the] Middleware SOA suite. Hence Oracle BPM can be directly installed with Oracle WebLogic. Oracle BPM comes with [a] standard out of the box portal. Recently Oracle has introduced another Web based portal to design processes. Standard Oracle BPM workflows can be created using the Jdeveloper. Deploying BPM apps are easy to deploy over Weblogic. All features with Weblogic can be utilized with Oracle BPM. Oracle BPM is [a] standard Middleware product and can make excellent front end applications.

Incentivized

• They are at the forefront of any changes with the way the ATO is working
• The pro-actively find solutions for problems that could arise
• They keep us informed of any downtime with their product or the ATO
• They get almost all documents from the portal without any input from us.

Incentivized

• It can easily integrate with other Oracle products and even 3rd party software via adapters
• It scales quite well and can handle the biggest enterprise level solutions we throw at it
• The ability to use previous requirements as templates is invaluable

Incentivized

• Sometimes the ATOmate web portal is very slow
• There is a lack of logging of events that we as users can see
• We should be able to assign a partner to documents where the client is unknown

Incentivized

• Extremely complicated to work with. The WYSIWYG is of no help either since it very buggy and poorly designed. If you are a business or functional user, you will have a hard time using the application.
• The Oracle's "Using" and "Implementing" guides are nearly useless with no examples and case studies and there is no documentation available to learn or understand the process.
• Very few skilled developers are available in market who really understand how to implement Oracle BPM suite.

Incentivized

In many scenarios it should have provided more features. It took a lot of effort while debugging, making it difficult to maintain.

Not easy to debug errors.

Overall satisfactory

ATOmate has the ocr that is far superior to kofax and the client names and amounts on the ato forms are almost 99% captured. This was compared to about 80% with kofax

Incentivized

All are fairly similar in capabilities, but the Oracle BPM Suite has good support for BPMN 2.0, integrates well with open standards and has an excellent design/development platform when compared to the other BPM vendors. The Oracle BPM Suite integrates well with the complimentary Oracle Fusion Middleware products that typically accompany a BPM implementation, making it a part of an overall well integrated solution set. Oracle BPM also has very good monitoring, reporting and analytics support built-in.

• ATOMATE has allowed us to redeploy admin staff to different tasks and we have been cable to expand without needing more staff
• The only downside to it is the admin staff used to keep excel sheets that would be checked off every quarter and the partners used that sheet to keep track of their workflow
• We no longer have to wait for paper correspondence from the ato as most gets picked up by ATOmate

Incentivized

• When we moved to Oracle BPM many years ago, it was a huge uplift for our business processes because we didn't have any tool to model flows except Outlook and Excel.
• We established and streamlined the manufacturing workflows that were needed with the growth of the business.
• We discovered after a while that the ROI was not great since along with the cost of the tools, we had to account the cost of development from the software team too. It took a lot of time to deliver our first automations due to the big learning curve needed for Oracle BPM.

Incentivized