Auth0 vs. One Identity Identity Manager

Great for user authentication and access priviledge management. We are using it for both our commercial and financial clients and Auth0 meets all the regulations and due diligence required to close deals with these enterprise customers. Given their tiered pricing structure, we don't see a scenario where Auth0 would not be appropriate for the solution it provides.

Incentivized

Well-suited: Companies with .NET or windows technology as a core. Companies with AD as main Directory Services Less appropriate: Companies with lot UNIX boxes Companies looking to support applications with many different connectors.

Incentivized

• RBAC is simple, straight forward and easy to manage
• Integrations of Social Login are simple to configure and the Auth0 documentation shows step by step how to configure it
• Rules/Hooks provide customization to the Auth0 flow, making it a great solution to define how we allow our users to login into our applications

Incentivized

• Audit Trace History: Out of the box enables important field to trace and give you flexibility to expand them thru configuration settings.
• Provisioning to Active Directory: Synchronization Editor gives you flexibility to define what and when needs to be on sync.
• Web Portal: Latest version is more user friendly and support mobile devices.

Incentivized

• Price point for ALL features can get a bit pricey. But they have a startup plan which helps big time. Developer plans start at $23/mo and do not include all features.
• Actions, rules, hooks, and email customization are great features, but the UI is a bit tough sometimes, not very responsive to screen size and code editors are cut off in a difficult place to maneuver.

Incentivized

• Web Designer: Hard to implement a new form from scratch.
• Rest API: Make more methods available.
• Connector: More connectors required like SNOW, Workday,etc.

Incentivized

For our purposes, Auth0 is still one of the best valued RBAC platforms in the market.

Incentivized

One of the key selling points of Auth0 for us was the ability for new associates to come in and get up to speed very quickly on the platform. The platform is very user friendly and its highly templated format means that it has little to no ramp up time

Incentivized

There isn't a clear method to get a hold of support when trouble arises if you're on their standard plan. You can file a support ticket and they generally are responsive. I've often been able to find similar questions to the questions I've had when it comes to support in their ticket history, however, some have been closed without a satisfactory conclusion for the original poster.

Incentivized

We went with Auth0 over Okta due to price concerns and the overall simplicity of Auth0. We chose Auth0 over Amazon Cognito because Cognito has very poor documentation and client library support. Auth0 offers a service that hits the sweet spot for organizations with small development teams and limited finances.

Incentivized

Selected due windows base technology, easy to deploy and AD connector.

Incentivized

• SAML SSO is a breeze - this alone saves a lot of dev/support hours.
• We are not worried by hackers and chasing security protocols and standards, I guess about half a day job of a developer.
• Telling customers we can connect them with what ever they have whether its social / SAML / OIDC put us in flexible position

Incentivized

• Positive impact because we now disable users immediately from the authoritative source.
• Positive impact due our integration with EPIC.

Incentivized