Autodesk Inventor vs PTC Windchill

• The program is very good at simplicity. Each of the buttons, menus, and options has an explanation of exactly what the feature does, and even a more advanced description if you desire to learn more about what each one does.
• Autodesk Inventor is a very fast program. Everything renders extremely quickly and there are no delays when examining a 3D model, part, or assembly. This is especially useful when giving a presentation about a product or design, and you need to be able to show a concept to an audience in real time.
• The software has an extremely accurate simulation feature that lets users do stress analysis on a 3D model. It can calculate precisely where the stress concentrations are going to be in a particular model and even give you an accurate depiction of where the part could likely fracture and/or fracture during loading.

Read full review

• It helps organize your company information.
• It helps solve the age old question on how is the best way to get the most important information into the hands that need it.
• You can connect all areas of your company to a single source data system.

Read full review

• Inventor demonstrates a lack of fluidity in the process of transferring data between programs.
• Inventor shows some lack of sophistication that certain features that are readily available in other design software packages are limited in use in Inventor.
• Inventor can often have difficulty in creating models that show true color, as in blacks can come out as dark grays in certain renders, even when the material and appearance settings are the same from part to part.

Read full review

• It can be difficult to integrate old data
• The user experience can be simplified

Read full review

• iLogic has enabled rapid design changes and model automation that save us time and money
• Cross-platform compatibility with other Autodesk products (e.g., CFD) keeps us in a single ecosystem with a single software vendor.
• Included data management tools save us from chasing files or components around and prevent data loss.

Read full review

• Time to implement
• Data migration
• Training of the users

Read full review