Likelihood to Recommend ShotGrid seems to be well suited for a video team for reviews and project tracking. It may not be well suited for Project managers who need to see the bigger picture of the project.
Read full review This tool enables the visual management needed in many offshore teams to easily and quickly see the pending work, work in progress and completed work.For teams that work with a waterfall methodology and do not have AGILE internalized, I believe there are other solutions from Planview or other providers.
Read full review Pros Uploads videos efficiently allows annotation within the video setting custom filters creating Gantt chart with inputs from each editor and animator adding versions to shot/asset adding assets to a shot Read full review Visual kanban board that is easy to customize as the team's needs change Real time collaboration allowing teams working remotely to stay up to date on current status Allows versatility for how a team needs to capture details on the work at hand by utilizing card icons, card types and custom data points Card scoring is easy to setup and provides the team the ability to set values to better prioritize their backlog Ability to add card automation to take out some of the repetitive manual actions Read full review Cons Ordering comments made by different people by timecode/frame number, instead by the time and date the comment was made Being able to move an uploaded video from shots to assets and vice versa. Right now we have to re-upload but lose any comments made already if they were in the wrong place Custom filters are great but they could get a little confusing with all the options. Might help with guidelines or a place we could ask what we want and someone could answer with the best way to achieve those specific filters we want Read full review Ability to add more than 1 visual cue to the card. We use custom icons and sometimes more than 1 is appropriate but you have to choose which is most important since only 1 can be applied. Better visibility to board access from the user administration screens. Currently have to run 1-2 reports to see this information. Would like to be able to click on a user within Configure Users and see what boards they have access to quickly. Read full review Likelihood to Renew For education, we can't see ourselves using anything else that comes at a cost
Read full review we are happy with the tool and the service and continuos improvement of the tool so there is no need yet to change to another one.
Read full review Usability It's UI/UX is very robust. There's a lot of functionality but it's not very intuitive or intuitive. I spend time with new hires and contractors to overview ShotGrid for a day and revisit after a week or two. Questions always arise down the line
Read full review LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Nate Dillon Front-End Web Developer, Office of Mediated Education
Read full review Reliability and Availability Not experienced any outage
Read full review Performance Larger boards take longer to load
Read full review Support Rating Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
Read full review Implementation Rating Very easy.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Wipster had limitations on video uploads, which was a major drawback. One thing we liked with
Wipster was how we can see comments made in order on the timeline while watching the video.
Read full review Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.
Read full review Scalability Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review Return on Investment We spend less time going back and forth with different stakeholders on shots and assets We don't have to pay services that only provided trial versions There is unlimited video uploading which was not the case with wiz Read full review LeanKit has made it easier for new employees to understand other employees' roles in the company by seeing their workload. It makes it clear who is responsible for what project so that there is more accountability at our company. It helps our project manager schedule new projects in a way that we all can see. Read full review ScreenShots Planview AgilePlace Screenshots