Autostub vs. LoadComplete

Autostub

LoadComplete

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Autostub	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	AutoStub™ is a tool to accelerate API development, designed to reduce build time by designing, prototyping, documenting and testing APIs . It creates a functional mock that allows developers or prospective users to work with the API before it’s fully implemented. Autostub allows developers to mock web services, helping developers of applications that depend on APIs to speed development and improve quality by facilitating functional testing. Key Features · …	N/A
LoadComplete	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.	$287 one-time fee

Pricing

Autostub

LoadComplete

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Subscription Starter: $239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter: $287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro: $699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro: $887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium: $899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium: $1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise: Let's chat

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Autostub	LoadComplete
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Top Pros	Pro Managing multiple Pro Api development	Pro Load testing Pro Detailed reports Pro Easy to use
Top Cons	Minus Third party plugins Minus Add ons Minus Bug tracking	Minus Gather data Minus Rather slow Minus User to customize

Features

Autostub

LoadComplete

Load Testing

Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
	Autostub - Ratings	LoadComplete 8.2 5 Ratings 3% below category average
End to end performance management	00 Ratings	8.45 Ratings
Integrated performance data	00 Ratings	9.54 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility	00 Ratings	6.95 Ratings
Real time monitoring	00 Ratings	7.95 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection	00 Ratings	8.44 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 7.6 out of 10	JMeter Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises	ReadyAPI Score 7.6 out of 10	JMeter Score 8.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (5 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear If you are testing an application and you don't have experience in performance testing, this tool will help you to test the load with some documentation help. It's very easy to use. and if you have complex scenarios to determine the coding and adjusting graphs, the LoadComplete will not be a helpful tool for you. Incentivized MA Mohamed Atef Staff Software Quality Engineer Read full review
Pros	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear We have been using LoadComplete in the Tech Department. I usually use LoadComplete to test the speed and loads of several applications we develop in-house. Moreover, we have also used LoadComplete to create reports and at the same time report any issues that we notice during a certain load. It is an affordable platform. LoadComplete has a lot of good features which has made my life so much easier so there are many pros of this tool as well. It is quite easy to use and comes in very handy. Incentivized Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Read full review
Cons	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Slow when the size of tests increase Coding is not possible Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear We chose loadcomplete because we already use SmartBear software for other automation solutions. Porting over test cases is easy and a user can have a test up and running within minutes. I do wish SmartBear would have better support and I haven't used any other testing tool in a while to make a comparison. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Many built-in features (like auto data correlation, load distributing etc) will save time for development. Incentivized Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots	Autostub Screenshots