Autostub vs. LoadComplete

Autostub

LoadComplete

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Autostub	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	AutoStub™ is a tool to accelerate API development, designed to reduce build time by designing, prototyping, documenting and testing APIs . It creates a functional mock that allows developers or prospective users to work with the API before it’s fully implemented. Autostub allows developers to mock web services, helping developers of applications that depend on APIs to speed development and improve quality by facilitating functional testing. Key Features · …	N/A
LoadComplete	Score 8.3 out of 10	N/A	SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.	$287 one-time fee

Pricing

Autostub

LoadComplete

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Subscription Starter: $239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter: $287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro: $699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro: $887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium: $899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium: $1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise: Let's chat

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Autostub	LoadComplete
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Autostub	LoadComplete

Features

Autostub

LoadComplete

Load Testing

Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
	Autostub - Ratings	LoadComplete 8.8 4 Ratings 3% above category average
End to end performance management	00 Ratings	8.84 Ratings
Integrated performance data	00 Ratings	9.93 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility	00 Ratings	7.84 Ratings
Real time monitoring	00 Ratings	7.94 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection	00 Ratings	9.83 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 6.5 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 6.5 out of 10
Enterprises	ReadyAPI Score 6.5 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 6.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.9 (4 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Autostub	LoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear I think that LoadComplete is adequate when you have Testcomplete. If LoadComplete is not paired with Testcomplete then there would be a bit of a learning curve. People who are already using Testcomplete will find it easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has a lot to improve and support customization to suit our needs. Incentivized Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Read full review
Pros	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Easy and handy UI options to select Good support from documentation Eye-catching results Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data. Allow user to customize the graph. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear JMeter is a more flexible tool because it gives the possibility to write scripts. Incentivized Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Read full review
Return on Investment	Torry Harris Integration Solutions No answers on this topic	SmartBear This tool always yields eye-catching results. It has good support from the documentation. Also, it generates detailed reports which is a very good thing. There is also a record and play feature in LoadComplete which means all applications can be recorded like Applications Servers’ Metric and so on. This tool has a good reporting and record playback due to which I will recommend it. Incentivized Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Read full review
ScreenShots	Autostub Screenshots