Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG) vs. Cisco Firepower 2100 Series

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Avast SIG
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Avast Business Secure Internet Gateway (SIG) is designed to replace traditional hardware by delivering cloud-based firewall capabilities from Avast's global cloud network. The service ensures network security is always on, always updating, and always protecting the business. SIG is built to eliminate the gaps in protection caused by legacy, on-premise security hardware.N/A
Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco offers the Firepower 2100 Series NGFW, designed to allow businesses to gain resiliency through superior security with sustained performance. The Firepower 2100 Series has a dual multicore CPU architecture that optimizes firewall, cryptographic, and threat inspection functions simultaneously, to achieve security doesn’t come at the expense of network performance.N/A
Pricing
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Firepower 2100
3,000-20,000
per appliance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Avast SIGCisco Firepower 2100 Series
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Features
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)
10.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
8.5
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Identification Technologies10.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Visualization Tools10.01 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Content Inspection10.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Policy-based Controls10.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP10.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Firewall Management Console10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Reporting and Logging10.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
VPN10.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
High Availability10.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Stateful Inspection10.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Proxy Server10.01 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
5.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG)Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Likelihood to Recommend
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
The scenario that Avast is great would be for large companies, where it works through homeoffice. Avast would be a bad idea for the educational institution, that is, a place where it will be directed to an underage audience, but I believe that Avast is on its way to becoming a global use system, so in the future it can be used in scenarios.
Read full review
Cisco
The Cisco [Firepower] 2100 [Series] is an easy sell for anyone looking. You already know Cisco excels in the security department, but now that firepower lives right on the box and inline with the rest of the firewall data flow you can save yourself a lot of time and headaches. Unless you cant quite afford Cisco's 2100 line, there's not much reason to go with the competition.
Read full review
Pros
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
  • ‘Designer’ of the site is great
  • Access places
  • The easiness to follow each demand
Read full review
Cisco
  • Advanced threat protection
  • Secure VPN connectivity
  • Visibility and control (if connected to FMC)
  • Regulatory compliacnce with ISO 27001, NIS2, etc.
Read full review
Cons
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
  • Should be able to leave in only 1 language
  • Make Avast more communicative
  • It has the possibility of leaving it our way
Read full review
Cisco
  • Career-wise very familiar with the ASAs, you know, the previous gen firewalls, Pyxis, ASAs, the CHA. As far as being intuitive, those seem to be far more intuitive to learn and figure out what the features and changes and config management, all that stuff is. With Firepower, it's a learning curve and I feel like I have quite a bit of experience with it, and so does my team, but feels like it's not as intuitive, and trying to make changes just always seems harder for some reason. We've gone to some Cisco security training and all that, but even then it's just harder to work with. The other big thing is, and this is a big gripe of mine, I suppose, that on any other firewall, when we have various different manufacturers, if you make a change, you know, a simple change object, object name gets changed or object is deleted or whatever the simplest of change is, it gets implemented instantly.
  • With the Firepower system, you have to deploy the change and it'll take about six or seven minutes for the change to actually take, which is insanely different than any other platform where that change is instantaneous. So let's say if I'm making seven different changes for a troubleshooting job I don't know which one of the seven is gonna fix it, I do one by one by one. I'm like, oh, let me try one change, one second, change, third change, four changes. It's going to take seven deploys. And seven deploys mean it's gonna take an hour of just deploy time. So that is a big, big gripe
Read full review
Usability
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
No answers on this topic
Cisco
There are three main problems with this platform: - short EoL time - it is really missery because this platform was overrated from cisco sales and after shor time they accepted on EoL - sometimes problems with upgrades paths, because of strange behaviour between FXOS and ASA image on the top of it - not good performance when comparing to newer 1k platform
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
In my institution we didn't choose Avast, as they see the best for the team, that is, in this case I didn't have access to the other Avast. But in this case, I can pass on my experience with the Avast that I use. It is great, but it is necessary to improve in several aspects, such as the structure.
Read full review
Cisco
In the days of purchase of Cisco Firepower 2100 series it was new platform and Cisco aimed their sailsmains to force selling this platfrom. It was one of the first platform with FXOS with full support of ASA images. It was cheper then 4k series and would be better than ASA 5500-x series (but regarding all problems with upgrades and EoL , it is not).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Gen (NortonLifeLock, Avast, Avira, AVG)
  • Great for team communication
  • Great for improving our understanding of the product.
  • Terrible in language setting
Read full review
Cisco
  • Simplifying our lives by reducing our time spent in a console
  • Being comfortable knowing the full might of Cisco is safeguarding your network
  • A good excuse to bump up the IT budget in the next fiscal year!
Read full review
ScreenShots