AVEVA Work Tasks vs. Bizagi Digital Business Platform

Anything where form input is required, data presentation and custom interface screens, connected to a database or API backend. Also good at process orchestration, where tasks need to be allocated and completed as part of a workflow, it supports delegation and escalation. It does fit well tieing together other AVEVA products.

Incentivized

Permits dependence reduction on external IT suppliers, maximum value extraction from large/legacy systems, and business and IT collaboration. For big Companies, while an enterprise should expect to face a lot of difficulties, thus increasing the learning curve, while dealing with the platform's rollout the timeline to deploy is extensive.

Incentivized

• Wysiwyg form editor
• Desktop and mobile display
• Extensibility with JavaScript and c#
• Web API calls

Incentivized

• design process
• enable to collaborate on process with customer
• enable to generate good world documents
• has a clear view how the process will looks like
• enable to design roles in the workflow

Incentivized

• Workflow editor user interface, a little clunky and has a learning curve
• Permissions model is complex
• Themes and corporate branding requires detailed css
• Upgrades require very thorough testing of developed artefacts

Incentivized

• Some minor things to improve but works pretty well. If you have an idea to improve Bizagi Modeler, you can post it on the Bizagi forum, and maybe, in a next release, you will find it realized. Yes, it happened to me.

Try it and you will understand.

The features and capability is very good, but there is a learning curve to develop within it. It does take some effort to become proficient and build forms and workflows, however once deployed and running they are extremely reliable. The mobile application is quite good but best suited to be on an on-prem network rather than internet facing.

Incentivized

It is applicable in any complex process scenario- regardless of company function. Though it is very useful and customizable, it is best to be deployed by a centralized team or experts in BPMN and coding, as all of the customizing options can quickly overwhelm any citizien developer and lead to harmful results

Incentivized

Online training Free Well chaptered Progressive

Power Apps is good for microsoft, and basic forms, Work Tasks is more powerful. Other middleware is better for pure data integration but doesnt enable user interaction. There are some other options, Redhat has a similar product as well but it wasnt as mature when we were evaluating.

Incentivized

The pricing/value proposition of the product compared to its competitors is very competitive.

The cost is reasonable, especially for what you get, and especially for this software segment.

Incentivized

• We have built our entire EOM reconciliation process for production management, this is not possible without Work Tasks
• We have complete standalone processes and applications built in Work Tasks, where complex steps and integrations are required. It is faster and cheaper than multiple bespoke products
• The API integration has allowed us to tie applications together where user input is required and middleware doesnt quite work

Incentivized

• it speeds up very much designing the workflows so we save time and money
• it helps to accept process with customer so it also safe time and money

Incentivized