Likelihood to Recommend Still the best IMHO for dynamic prototyping. Sometimes you need to wireframe novel on-page widgets, such as draggable search areas (in the context of map-based search), or interactive annotations on diagrams. And sometimes real data values are necessary for test participants to give good feedback. However, this is something of a niche scenario. The majority of uxers prefer xd or
Figma and find that static prototypes (screen1->click->screen2) is sufficient.
Read full review When building a new product or even a new startup - this tool is priceless, in demonstrating a product's potential without really building it and investing expensive resources before you have users' validation. It's less usable for any backend planning, or when the system behind is too complicated and any user interaction changes the dataset behind the scenes
Read full review Pros Adaptive views enable us to create truly responsive designs, even when they are very complex. The platform’s many available templates and ability to create a library of reusable designs enables us to prototype faster and more efficiently than creating every single design from the ground up. The company provides a lot of support options, from training videos to online forums. This is a pretty complex tool, so knowing that we can always look up or ask a question and get a quick answer has helped us immensely. Axure’s comprehensive suite of tools to portray interactivity in prototypes has truly helped us show stakeholders and clients what an end product will look like, which has really helped us gain necessary internal and external buy-in. Read full review Prototype feature: enables to move from one screen to another as if the buttons are real Premade elements: makes it easy to build the mockup and give it a professional look and feel Easy to edit and change as we go Read full review Cons The user interface is somewhat old and not always the most intuitive. I've been using Axure RP for 5 years and often forget that it has a steep learning curve, which makes it harder to onboard new employees. The "teams" functionality, as far as working and sharing the same files, has some room for performance improvements. Results of the Preview function varies per browser (although it works best on Chrome). Read full review When navigating on the big board, it's hard to track the different screens when there are a few dozen of them Prototype mode: there should be an easier way to track the screen that needs to be connected from a specific element I'd like to use a proofreading extension on top of Visiliy, such as Grammarly, so I won't have to look for those typos Read full review Usability Axure feels like a tool that started with a simple interface that wasn't redesigned over time. Simple tasks sometimes require clicking through multiple layers. Crucial pieces of functionality are hidden under text links, or just flatly aren't discoverable. Much of the quirks of the interface only come from having screwed up numerous times, and knowing that certain things are just difficult to accomplish.
Read full review Support Rating I've never used the support for Axure but they do have an online community that can be helpful when you're unsure how to accomplish a specific bit of interactivity. Overall the community for Axure is a great benefit for the software. There are also a lot of shared library assets which can help reduce the time you spend on projects.
Read full review Online Training I think that the online training videos cover all product features and are a great resource to point people to. The newsletter is also frequent and passes on a range of tips and techniques for users that are eager to learn more, or just want to keep themselves up to date
Read full review Alternatives Considered Since Axure RP is a desktop software that can work without a cloud connection, it is easy to have approved within a highly restricted corporate environment for a low cost with a small team.
iRise is a solution that requires greater amounts of management, best service a group of designers in a corporate environment.
InVision is cloud-based and, although not impossible, would require a long-term agreement to be made between the corporate and
InVision . These could take years.
Origami is free and desktop based and has great control of the transitions and data - but is so granular that additional time commitments may have to be made to make a prototype of this fidelity
Read full review The possibility to animate to mockup is very valuable and needed at the product's early stage and validation stage
Read full review Return on Investment Axure allows for us to quickly get the entire sales team trained on a specific narrative and gives them a fool proof click path for them to use in the demo. Axure is relatively inexpensive and allows for purchasing the software without having to pay a monthly subscription (although they do have that option). The Sketch integration has allowed for a 10 fold increase in productivity by taking designs already created in another program and quickly adding them to Axure. Read full review Saved us hours of developing the wrong product, since we could enhance validation by demoing a pre-built product by using Visily Helped us communicate ideas between Product and Developer roles within our team Cost us some extra time in design, because we didn't import the design from Visily to Miro, which created an overlap Read full review ScreenShots