Azure Container Apps vs. Google Cloud Run

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Container Apps
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A
Google Cloud Run
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application.N/A
Pricing
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Editions & Modules
vCPU (seconds)
active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
Memory (GiB-Seconds)
active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Considered Both Products
Azure Container Apps

No answer on this topic

Google Cloud Run
Chose Google Cloud Run
The Goolge docs for their products as well as the UI is a lot nicer than AWS or Azure and in general I found it much easy to work with. We selected Google mainly because of startup credits and the support offered but can confidently say we would choose them again without that …
Features
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure Container Apps
5.4
2 Ratings
37% below category average
Google Cloud Run
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces5.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability7.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability5.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control4.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration4.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation4.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification5.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Container Apps
-
Ratings
Google Cloud Run
7.4
15 Ratings
8% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.415 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.114 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings2.71 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.215 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings7.511 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings8.514 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings8.712 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.215 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(2 ratings)
8.6
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
2.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Container AppsGoogle Cloud Run
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
Read full review
Google
Microservices and RestFul API application as it is fast and reliant. Seamless integration with event triggers such as pubsub or event arc, so you can easily integrate that with usecases with file uploads, database changes, etc. Basically great with short-lived tasks, if however, you have long-running processses, Cloud Run might not be idle for this. For example if you have a long running data processing task, other solutions such as kubeflow pipelines or dataflow are more suited for this kind of tasks. Cloud Run is also stateless, so if you need memory, you will have to connect an external database.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Gives user a level of autonomous access
  • No control plane or node pool to manage
  • Less kubernetes experience required
  • Easily integrate with Azure devops
Read full review
Google
  • Auto scaling is the best one
  • provide direct VPC connectivity and rigid network
  • Cloud SQL and Pub/Sub services
  • Handling latency issues
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Continue to enhance security
  • Better pricing
  • Flexibility
Read full review
Google
  • The UI can be made simpler. Currently the UI is bloated and it takes time to find out what you want
  • More integrations with container registry providers (ECR, dockerhub)
  • Better permissions UX. Currently GCP requires service accounts to be used with cloud products, the experience adding/removing permissions is difficult to navigate
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
Read full review
Google
We definitely need to renew it because we dont own our own infrastructure and storage and we are happy with Cloud Run features
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
Read full review
Google
The UI/console is great... the documentation is top-notch for developers, but the CLI itself when you have to script around it is very complex and easy to forget some options... the downside of a generic command line client.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
Not seen any major issues when we run applications its good
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
Initially we felt slow but slowly it picked up and easy to manage
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
I was involved in the initial implementation setup, Its easy with the given documentaiton we can do ourself. Not that critical
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Read full review
Google
AWS Lambda supports code zip package, enabling lower cold start time. Also, AWS Lambda pricing is much simpler, easier to understand.
Other than that, the 2 products are very similar, including the Docker image support: the image must be built based on proprietary base image.
Obviously, if your other services are running in GCP, then Google Cloud Run is your only choice for tight integration, & private networking.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
Not part of purchase.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
It has good auto scale feature and reliable also
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
We have very good support when needed
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
  • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
  • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
Read full review
Google
  • Built in support for auto scaling helps reduce operational overhead
  • Any application performance issues can be addressed quickly by allocating more resources while a proper fix can be planned and rolled out later
  • Using Google Cloud Run enables development of microservices which provides granular control for scaling critical services in the platform
Read full review
ScreenShots