Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure Cosmos DB | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is Microsoft's Big Data analysis platform. It is a NoSQL database service and is a replacement for the earlier DocumentDB NoSQL database. | N/A |
GraphDB | Score5 out of 10 | N/A | Ontotext helps enterprises to identify meaning across diverse datasets and massive amounts of unstructured information since 2000. Ontotext offers technology and services for the development of big knowledge graphs, interlinking multiple structured datasets. Analysis of such graphs provides semantic entity profiles that enable more accurate text analysis, which in turn delivers metadata, new entities and relationships to enrich the graphs. Ontotext’s most popular product is GraphDB(TM) – a… | N/A |
Neo4j | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden. | $65 per month |
| Azure Cosmos DB | GraphDB | Neo4j | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure Cosmos DB | GraphDB | Neo4j | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | ![]() | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure Cosmos DB | GraphDB | Neo4j | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Neo4j Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | HBase Score7.3 out of 10 | Neo4j Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Cassandra Score9 out of 10 | Neo4j Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure Cosmos DB | GraphDB | Neo4j | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.6 | - | - |
| Usability | 8.8 | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.2 | - | - |
| Azure Cosmos DB | GraphDB | Neo4j | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |