Azure Data Factory vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Data Factory
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Data Factory is a service built for all data integration needs and skill levels. It is designed to allow the user to easily construct ETL and ELT processes code-free within the intuitive visual environment, or write one's own code. Visually integrate data sources using more than 80 natively built and maintenance-free connectors at no added cost. Focus on data—the serverless integration service does the rest.N/A
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Data Integrator is an ELT data integrator designed with interoperability other Oracle programs. The program focuses on a high-performance capacity to support Big Data use within Oracle.N/A
Pricing
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Considered Both Products
Azure Data Factory
Chose Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory is more of a universal pipeline. SAP BW is a tool offering good SAP connectivity but very limited third-party connectivity. The same is the case with BW4hana. Sap DataSphere is offering better connectivity with SAP sources, but not so good when compared to …
Chose Azure Data Factory
Informatica is a great product. However, given the Azure ecosystem and the pay-as-you-go model's optimal cost, Azure Data Factory was our choice. Also, it is better on the data ingestion and orchestration side. For complex data transformation, we can consider technologies like …
Chose Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory fits well into our overall systems architecture where we already utilize largely Azure services and also Microsoft based products in the on-premises environment. I think cost structure is also very competitive with Azure Data Factory. Most services provide a …
Chose Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory helps us automate to schedule jobs as per customer demands to make ETL triggers when the need arises. Anyone can define the workflow with the Azure Data Factory UI designer tool and easily test the systems. It helped us automate the same workflow with …
Chose Azure Data Factory
The easy integration with other Microsoft software as well as high processing speed, very flexible cost, and high level of security of Microsoft Azure products and services stack up against other similar products.
Chose Azure Data Factory
I'd chose data factory because its very easy to use, its UI is beautiful, it's library for .net is very useful and it lives within the microsoft ecosystem.
Chose Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory is a relatively new player in the space, and its feature set marks it as such. It does not have the full features of a more mature product set such as any of the above. However, it does allow for the creation of ETL/ELT flows/pipelines with minimal initial …
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
This is very easy to integrate with Oracle data sources and as most of my databases are in oracle so I gave preference to this tool.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
I have used Trifacta Google Data Prep quite a bit. We use Google Cloud Platform across our organization. The tools are very comparable in what they offer. I would say Data Prep has a slight edge in usability and a cleaner UI, but both of the tools have comparable toolsets.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Oracle Data Integrator works very well if the rest of your systems are in the Oracle environment. There are some other good alternatives out there, but for what Oracle Data Integrator has to offer, it is good. It is also a little harder to use compared to the other ones I have …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
We were using Actian Pervasive before switching to Oracle and the main reason was the cost. We were getting less functionality at even more cost. Although it is much faster in terms of operation, Oracle makes it easy to connect to all data sources making data integration easier …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
I have used the Pentaho Data Integrator ETL tools in different projects with the SQL Server Integration Services product from the Microsoft product family. Oracle Data Integrator ETL product is efficient in projects where Oracle databases are heavily used. The end-user …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Powerful features and Oracle based
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
I think that Oracle Data Integrator is much better because of the user interface it provides.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Chose Oracle Data Integrator for its compatibility and integration with Oracle Goldengate
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
ODI is best suited for Oracle Hyperion environments. We have also used it to manage files on different operating systems.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Talend Data Integrator has been evaluated during the setup of the architecture for a customer, in comparison to ODI, since it's an open source ETL. But, differently from the meaning of "open source", it has licence costs too that aren't that different from ODI ones. Moreover, …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
ODI is the naturel successor of OWB, adopting the same EL-T approach but supporting a lot more technologies as source and target. The overall product is much more stable and not tied to the Oracle database.
Unlike Informatica, ODI generates all the code in the native underlying …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Because of variety of my projects that I involved, I used nearly all the world wide known tools within data warehouse environment.
  • Data Modeling Tools : Sybase Power Designer, SQL Developer Data Modeler, ERwin Data Modeler.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
We migrated to ODI from OWB - and we found ODI to be light years ahead of OWB (features, performance, and connectivity). We also looked at Informatica, but were turned down by its cost. Being a SAP Business Objects shop, we also considered the SAP Data Integrator tool (it …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Oracle's own ETL tool was Oracle Warehouse Builder, initially. When Oracle built the Oracle Business Intelligence Applications Suite, Oracle is in need of a strong ETL. As Oracle Warehouse Builder is not a strong ETL that customers prefer and as already Informatica captured …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
We thought IBM was too expensive and more difficult to use. With Microsoft, since we have our main application running with Oracle DB, we understood it’d be easier for us to work with ODI.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Oracle Data Integrator is a superior tool when dealing with Hyperion Planning and Essbase cubes and applications. The native connectors allow for easy data movement and transformations from one environment to the other. I do believe that Oracle Data Integrator is a very complex …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Informatica was slightly more intuitive but slightly less powerful than Oracle Data Integrator. My use of Informatica was much less extensive than Oracle Data Integrator, so I can not speak as in-depth about the strengths and weaknesses of Informatica. We used ODI much more for …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
ODI is less user friendly than FDM and DRM but is much easier to deploy than core ETL tools such as HAL or Informatica. The tool is easier to master and is usually more than capable of handling the run of the mill tasks required for Hyperion deployments. It has been a good …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
IBM Infosphere, Informatica. I worked on the mentioned tools as well as ODI. I liked ODI because it is easy to use with great features that every other ETL tool has in the market.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Our organization was using the Oracle BPM and the Oracle Data Integrator has good integration with BPM. We got good support from Oracle in setting up the integrated environment.
Features
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
8.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources9.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
7.8
Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.9
Ratings
20% above category average
Simple transformations8.70 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Complex transformations7.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
Data model creation4.40 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Metadata management5.40 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Business rules and workflow6.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Collaboration7.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Testing and debugging6.30 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
5.6
Ratings
36% below category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.1
Ratings
12% above category average
Integration with data quality tools4.30 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools7.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Data FactoryOracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Likelihood to Recommend
Azure Data Factory is a great data integration tool for developing a cloud data platform, especially within the Azure ecosystem. Azure Data Factory is very good for the Data Ingestion part. It can work for simple data transformation with its Data Flow, but it will also need cluster configuration, and there is some cost. Also, it is an excellent tool for orchestrating data pipelines. But for complex data transformations, you may need to use technologies like Databricks and PySpark.
Read full review
I tried various ETL tools and here is [where and] why I recommend Oracle Data Integrator. 1. When you want to process structured data from different databases - Teradata, Exadata, DB2, SQL, Oracle etc. 2. Oracle Data Integrator supports all platforms, hardware, and OS. This is a major advantage compared to other leading tools. 3. The ELT architecture giving a cutting edge performance over leading ETL tools. There is no need to align Oracle Data Integrator between source and target. ODI uses the source and target servers to perform complex transformations. 4. Speeds up the development and maintenance by reducing the code that developers need to write
Read full review
Pros
  • It allows copying data from various types of data sources like on-premise files, Azure Database, Excel, JSON, Azure Synapse, API, etc. to the desired destination.
  • We can use linked service in multiple pipeline/data load.
  • It also allows the running of SSIS & SSMS packages which makes it an easy-to-use ETL & ELT tool.
Read full review
  • Converts data from various sources into one target format using various business logic rules and integrates with various DBMS types.
  • Transformed data from DB2, SQL Server and other Oracle databases into flat files and then used ETL jobs to load into Oracle DB target
  • Data Integrator and Goldengate were used together to accomplish the data movement needed for business and data consolidation in live environment. Data Integrator helped with development and in reducing lead time to convert data into target.
Read full review
Cons
  • Limited source/sink (target) connectors depending on which area of Azure Data Factory you are using.
  • Does not yet have parity with SSIS as far as the transforms available.
Read full review
  • Oracle support is not the best when needing help with the system
  • The documentation is also very poor and takes very long to generate
  • Some parts of it are not intuitive to use and get hard to troubleshoot
  • Like other Oracle products, you must have very, very thorough knowledge about their systems to understand
  • Like all Oracle products, cost is high
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It is maturing and over time will have a good pool of resources. Each new version has addressed the issues of the previous ones. Its getting better and bigger.
Read full review
Usability
So far product has performed as expected. We were noticing some performance issues, but they were largely Synapse related. This has led to a shift from Synapse to Databricks. Overall this has delayed our analytic platform. Once databricks becomes fully operational, Azure Data Factory will be critical to our environment and future success.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We have not had need to engage with Microsoft much on Azure Data Factory, but they have been responsive and helpful when needed. This being said, we have not had a major emergency or outage requiring their intervention. The score of seven is a representation that they have done well for now, but have not proved out their support for a significant issue
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Azure Data Factory is more of a universal pipeline. SAP BW is a tool offering good SAP connectivity but very limited third-party connectivity. The same is the case with BW4hana. SAP Datasphere is offering better connectivity with SAP sources, but not so good when compared to adf. Power Center of Informatica is a legacy tool, and Anaplan is a planning tool with limited connectivity options.
Read full review
Talend Data Integrator has been evaluated during the setup of the architecture for a customer, in comparison to ODI, since it's an open source ETL. But, differently from the meaning of "open source", it has licence costs too that aren't that different from ODI ones. Moreover, the other components of the business intelligence architecture of the customer were Oracle, so we thought that ODI would suit at best with them, more than a different vendor software.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cost Savings: By automating our ETL processes with Azure Data Factory, we've reduced manual data handling by approximately 60%. This translates to savings from reduced man-hours and the overhead of maintaining legacy systems.
  • Timeliness: Our report generation time has reduced by 70% with Azure Data Factory's scheduled pipelines. Faster insights mean quicker decisions for us, enabling our teams to capitalize on time-sensitive opportunities. We can easily share the data visualizations to all stakeholders.
Read full review
  • Oracle Data Integrator helps provide a business with the data it needs to defend the decisions it makes.
  • Oracle Data Integrator allows you to analyze data from what can be separate, different, and often outdated data sources. It allows you to make direct comparisons when analyzing data from different pieces of equipment.
  • Data from Oracle Data Integrator was used to analyze manufacturing quality and drive down spoilage, saving the company money.
Read full review
ScreenShots