Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
Copado
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Copado is a Salesforce-native DevOps platform that helps teams deliver software faster, with less risk and more confidence.N/A
HashiCorp Waypoint
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Waypoint, from HashiCorp, provides a workflow to build, deploy, and release across platforms. Waypoint uses a single configuration file and common workflow to manage and observe deployments across platforms such as Kubernetes, Nomad, EC2, and Google Cloud Run.N/A
Pricing
Azure DevOps ServerCopadoHashiCorp Waypoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOps ServerCopadoHashiCorp Waypoint
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOps ServerCopadoHashiCorp Waypoint
User Ratings
Azure DevOps ServerCopadoHashiCorp Waypoint
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(48 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOps ServerCopadoHashiCorp Waypoint
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
Copado Solutions
When we have a large organization and number of changes and deployments are more than we should go for Copado. As we know it is a paid managed package and the cost is high so for dealing with fewer deployments it is not preferable to buy. Copado is well suited for users who don't have much technical understanding. So those users can see the User interface select the changes that need to be deployed by selecting the metadata. From Git operation to deployment all is handled by Copado itself. Copado has reduced the efforts for creating the package.xml and direct deployments can be done within a few clicks. Another Major aspect is that it can be directly synced with Jira or Azzure board from where the user stories will be synced and actions can be performed accordingly. For small organization, Copado can be expensive and to set up and maintain we need a technical person to do so.
Read full review
IBM
Waypoint is very similar to teraform , it can run a ec2 machine, an ECS service, Azure containers, Google containers and many more , which is one of the most advantageous thing about waypoint . The team that we are working with has a hybrid customer based in multiple clouds like AWS, Azure and GCP.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
Copado Solutions
  • Capturing latest changes accurately in the commit window
  • Auto resolving conflicts
  • gate checks for apex code coverage.
  • Giving insights into the validation errors
  • very easy to migrate data & metadata between orgs, just with few clicks
Read full review
IBM
  • The infrastructure as a code concept is simple and easy to learn in waypoint
  • You can integrate waypoint with various code repositories like Github, Gitlab etc
  • The waypoint UI provides a interactive interface to view the status of your builds
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
Copado Solutions
  • In deployment, the Query can be lost when editing, which can cause a lot of problems.
  • The Query option is cumbersome, but it works!
  • The deployment instructions fields could be made into rich text fields which would be awesome.
Read full review
IBM
  • Need more controlling environment which is missing in waypoint
  • The UI lags sometimes which can be problematic at times
  • It uses HCL language which is outdated , can be moved to YAML which is used by most of the tools
  • Need to copy the endpoint everytime from waypoint to my browser
  • It forces me to install a server
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
Copado Solutions
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
Copado Solutions
very good user interface. It has reduced tons of manual efforts for the developers. Very easy to validate the release work. Easy to club multiple stories into one deployment. We can integrate Copado with our JIRA and all the PR’s are visible under the user story on JIRA board. But this can be overwhelming for beginners
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
Copado Solutions
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
Copado Solutions
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
Copado Solutions
There are tools such as ANT migration tool or using sfdx but Copado makes the deployments super simple. If a user is not that technically strong still he can use Copado and deploy the changes in a few clicks. Copado provides a complete package of maintaining the development and repositories in a common platform. There are pipelines that you can set that changes will move from which org to the final org in a very organized manner. We can perform static code analysis at the time of deployment of the changes and we have to clear those if we need to deploy the changes. Creating pull requests is super easy and can be managed by Copado itself. Overall a superb managed package for deployment in Salesforce.
Read full review
IBM
As waypoint is developed by HashiCorp which is also a developer of teraform , the trust was already there . Moreover the simplicity of ease of access made our choice even more clearer against its competitors. The competitors were good but weren't able to compete with the versatility and suite of application and functionality provided by WAYPOINT.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
Copado Solutions
  • It has reduced the efforts to create package.xml manually and deploy the changes
  • Another positive impact is that we can track the commits to which org they have reached in an organized way and we don't need to maintain them separately
  • For setting Copado it take a lot of time and training is required for the complete setup which is time-consuming
Read full review
IBM
  • ROI was good as team was able to adapt to it in very less time
  • We were able to setup our hybrid cloud environment within 2 months smoothly
  • we created lot of POCs with waypoint which helped us procure a lot of customers
Read full review
ScreenShots