TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Tricentis qTest

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Tricentis

Connect with Tricentis

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Tricentis so that Tricentis and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure DevOps Server

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AAzure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A

    Tricentis qTest

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    91%
    Would buy again
    21 Answers
    78%
    Would buy again
    31 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    84%
    Delivers good value for the price
    26 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    37 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    13 Answers
    78%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    27 Answers
    Features
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Azure DevOps Server and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    Azure DevOps Server
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    8.3
    40 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings8.739 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.534 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.439 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings8.034 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure DevOps
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Azure DevOps
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (48 ratings)
    9.3
    (42 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.4
    (10 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure DevOps ServerTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
    • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
    • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Tricentis qTest helps regression while we get any production incident as we can directly check the test cases from Tricentis qTest which make sure whether it is missed or not.
    • We can add missing scenarios in our existing test cases which makes the test case maintenance quite simpler and QA can make sure that missing scenarios will be covered in future and not missed while functional testing.
    • Tricentis qTest is user friendly as new users can be onboarded in quick time. Which saves the time and effort of the organization level.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
    • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
    • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
    • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    It successfully balances deep enterprise functionality with a clean and modern interface. One of its strongest points is the intuitive, folder based navigation, which makes organizing test case and cycles feel natural. Learning curve is relatively shallow for the new team members to become productive without extensive onboarding. Also the deep integration with JIRA is a significant boost to its usability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
    • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
    • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Integrating qTest in our workflow helped us in 52% reduction in test authoring effort
    • Overall project management and the time calculation for the quality checking of each project can be managed good in qTest
    • It provides full tracability of a single project from the requirements to the defects raised it helps our team a lot
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis qTest Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards