Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Machine Learning
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Machine Learning is and end-to-end data science and analytics solution that helps professional data scientists to prepare data, develop experiments, and deploy models in the cloud. It replaces the Azure Machine Learning Workbench.
$0
per month
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.
$14
per month per user
QlikView
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
QlikView® is Qlik®’s original BI offering designed primarily for shared business intelligence reports and data visualizations. It offers guided exploration and discovery, collaborative analytics for sharing insight, and agile development and deployment.N/A
Pricing
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Editions & Modules
Studio Pricing - Free
$0.00
per month
Production Web API - Dev/Test
$0.00
per month
Studio Pricing - Standard
$9.99
per ML studio workspace/per month
Production Web API - Standard S1
$100.13
per month
Production Web API - Standard S2
$1000.06
per month
Production Web API - Standard S3
$9999.98
per month
Power BI Pro
$14
per month per user
Power BI Premium
$24
per month per user
QlikView
Custom
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsOn an perpetual license basis, based on server plus number of users. Contact vendor for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Considered Multiple Products
Azure Machine Learning

No answer on this topic

Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Specific data displays are some of the strongest aspects of Microsoft BI when compared to alternate programs. It also does a superior job in compatibility with many programs, especially those from Microsoft. Since my company primarily uses Office 365 and other Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
The software stacks [well] because it has more graphics resolution and the colors are fresh and actualized. On the other hand, there is the Microsoft family software and this is an advantage. Microsoft has a lot of users around the world and it's like everyone knows how to do …
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
One of the main reasons Microsoft BI was chosen by our company is because it is a reliable program. We tried different programs in the past (and currently also use other ones for certain reporting and analysis needs) but Microsoft BI was the least buggy out of our top choices.
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Looking at the visualization portion of BI, there are three types of tools.
  1. Programming packages. Free and powerful, they let you make any diagram, at the cost of difficulty of use.
  2. Specialist software like Tableau and Microsoft BI. This is the best choice in most cases due to …
QlikView
Chose QlikView
I was forced into QV by QuickBooks -- I did not have the opportunity to evaluate it specifically against other packages.
I have, however, seen Microsoft BI and BIRST --- both of which seem much more expensive (and perhaps complex) than QlikView. But I'm conjecturing a bit here.
Features
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.2
52 Ratings
12% above category average
QlikView
8.5
68 Ratings
4% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.045 Ratings8.050 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.552 Ratings9.466 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.250 Ratings8.060 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.7
52 Ratings
8% above category average
QlikView
8.1
67 Ratings
1% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.747 Ratings8.366 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.452 Ratings7.767 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.041 Ratings8.336 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.752 Ratings8.262 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.8
51 Ratings
7% above category average
QlikView
8.6
62 Ratings
5% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings9.247 Ratings8.049 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.047 Ratings9.056 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.243 Ratings7.542 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.046 Ratings10.048 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.626 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.9
51 Ratings
11% above category average
QlikView
7.4
58 Ratings
8% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.550 Ratings7.955 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.247 Ratings7.546 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings8.344 Ratings6.85 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.3
52 Ratings
9% above category average
QlikView
7.0
60 Ratings
19% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.549 Ratings8.159 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.246 Ratings5.755 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.049 Ratings6.055 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings9.25 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.3
41 Ratings
7% above category average
QlikView
8.0
47 Ratings
3% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.338 Ratings8.044 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.329 Ratings9.028 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.338 Ratings8.038 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.7
24 Ratings
12% above category average
QlikView
-
Ratings
REST API00 Ratings9.321 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings9.021 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings9.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings8.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.221 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings7.619 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(73 ratings)
7.7
(88 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(25 ratings)
8.8
(29 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(15 ratings)
8.0
(15 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
9.8
(4 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(2 ratings)
8.9
(15 ratings)
3.3
(15 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.6
(7 ratings)
7.4
(13 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Machine LearningMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For [a] data scientist require[d] to build a machine learning model, so he/she didn't worry about infrastructure to maintain it.
All kind of feature[s] such as train, build, deploy and monitor the machine learning model available in a single suite.
If someone has [their] own environment for ML studio, so there [it would] not [be] useful for them.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI has a lot of features and is a very powerful tool, especially if you have folks on your team that know how to utilize all of its capabilities. To truly unlock all that it can do, it does require people to have a deep understanding of its capabilities. That's where the software really shines. If you are looking for a simpler, more basic reporting tool, there are other programs available that do not require such a steep learning curve.
Read full review
Qlik
Sales data validations have helped manage our justifications in the past, especially with regard to new product development and new business introduction. It has also been helpful in identifying trends with business impact and direction specific to quarter and monthly sales from ERP data as well as decisions to purchase equipment of staffing based on run rates and product demand.
One thing that can get out of hand is data output - if you aren't careful in your query, you may be overloaded with data dumps and drown in the amount of info you have to filter through. This is a user caution, not a comment on the software itself.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • User friendliness: This is by far the most user friendly tool I've seen in analytics. You don't need to know how to code at all! Just create a few blocks, connect a few lines and you are capable of running a boosted decision tree with a very high R squared!
  • Speed: Azure ML is a cloud based tool, so processing is not made with your computer, making the reliability and speed top notch!
  • Cost: If you don't know how to code, this is by far the cheapest machine learning tool out there. I believe it costs less than $15/month. If you know how to code, then R is free.
  • Connectivity: It is super easy to embed R or Python codes on Azure ML. So if you want to do more advanced stuff, or use a model that is not yet available on Azure ML, you can simply paste the code on R or Python there!
  • Microsoft environment: Many many companies rely on the Microsoft suite. And Azure ML connects perfectly with Excel, CSV and Access files.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Comparatively easy to use compared to other data analytics solutions, collaborating with other colleagues on data work is simple.
  • Using Visual Studio for database, ETL, reporting, and analytics development save time and money.
  • Transfer of data from one application to another via Excel and comparison of data attributes between applications
  • Dashboard functionality, as well as Python support, are available, allowing you to add additional charts and graphs.
Read full review
Qlik
  • QlikView has a simple, relational data model that's REALLY fast. Filtering and changing data is dead simple results are almost immediately available.
  • The free version of Qlikview is almost completely featured, so you roll a pro-level product out to an entire department for really cheap.
  • QlikView is really flexible--if you can imagine it, you can build it.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It would be great to have text tips that could ease new users to the platform, especially if an error shows up
  • Scenario-based documentation
  • Pre-processing of modules that had been previously run. Sometimes they need to be re-run for no apparent reason
Read full review
Microsoft
  • MSBI designs can work on increasing data processing capabilities enough to handle the huge datasets etc.
  • It would be a lot better if it is a little low on cost.
  • it needs to create opportunities little more than they do regarding customization of some very unique visualization effects
Read full review
Qlik
  • We found that QlikView can be a bit slow in supporting some forms of encryption. It is web-based and we needed to upgrade all of our server to not support the older SSL and TLS 1 protocols, only support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. However, QlikView could not run with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. We had to wait over six months to get a version that would handle the newer TLS versions.
  • There are so many options with QlikView that you can get lost when developing a visualization. There are still items I have not yet figured out, such as labeling a graph with the name of a selected detail item.
  • QlikView works by pulling the data it is going to use for visualization into its database. I am a security reviewer and I need to make certain that PII and PHI is not pulled by QlikView for a visualization, otherwise this could become a reportable indecent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Qlik
Ease of use, ability to load from pretty much any data source. today I created an application that loaded time sheets from excel that are not in a table format. With Qlik's "enable transformation steps" I was able to automate loads of multiple spreadsheets and multiple tabs easily. Could not do that with any other tool.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Easy and fastest way to develop, test, deploy and monitor the machine learning model.
- Easy to load the data set
-Drag and drop the process of the Machine learning life cycle.
Read full review
Microsoft
The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
Read full review
Qlik
QlikView is very easy to implement. The installation is very straight forward. QlikView has several different data connectors that can connect to different data sources very smoothly. The user interface to build the reports is very easy to understand. This helps to have a smaller learning curve. Something very helpful is that QlikView is a browser application for the end users. So, you don't need to install any applications on the user's computer.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The product has been reliable.
Read full review
Qlik
We have not had any downtime issues with the product nor uncovered any significant bugs
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
Read full review
Qlik
It is not a SAAS product.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support is nonexistent. It's very frustrating to try and find someone to actually talk to. The robot chatbots are just not well trained.
Read full review
Microsoft
MSBI natively has a site that allows you to vote on user enhancements and bug fixes. This allows the largest nagging issues to float to the top and the development team can prioritize accordingly. As mentioned earlier, the large community base of MSBI developers assist technical resources in handling technical questions.
Read full review
Qlik
My experience with the Qlik support team has been somewhat limited, but every interaction I have had with them has been very professional and I received a response quickly. Typically if there is a technical issue, our IT team will follow up. My inquiries are specific to product functionality, and Qlik has been very helpful in clarifying any questions I might have.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
This training was more directed toward what the product was capable of rather than actual programming.
Read full review
Qlik
My team attended, but I cannot myself rate, but I think it was good as they've successfully launched a training program at our company themselves for users. It was 3-4 day training.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
Read full review
Qlik
Training was as expected. The demo environments tend to be more fully featured that our own environment, but the training was clear and well delivered.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not sure
Read full review
Microsoft
We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
Read full review
Qlik
"Implementation" can mean a few things... so I'm not sure that this is the answer you want.... but here it goes: To me, implementation means: "Is the user interface intuitive and can I produce meaningful reports with ease?" On that score, I'd say YES. The amount of training required was minimal and the results were powerful. The desktop implementation is a simple, "blank" interface just waiting for your creativity. The pre-populated templates give you a reasonable start to any project -- and a good set of objects to "play around with" if you're just getting started. Finally, note that the "implementation" I used was baked into QuickBooks 2016 Enterprise -- called "Advanced Reporting"..... That integration makes it ultra useful and simple.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved usability even for non-specialist users.
Read full review
Microsoft
We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
Read full review
Qlik
The only other vendor product that I have worked with that provides a similar experience to Qlikview is Tableau. I would recommend Tableau if your use case is to build a fixed dashboard. You can share reports for free without needing to buy additional licenses. I would recommend Qlikview if your users are looking for a more interactive experience. They can create new objects to represent the data which can't be accomplished as easily in Tableau
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Productivity: Instead of coding and recoding, Azure ML helped my organization to get to meaningful results faster;
  • Cost: Azure ML can save hundreds (or even thousands) of dollars for an organization, since the license costs around $15/month per seat.
  • Focus on insights and not on statistics: Since running a model is so easy, analysts can focus more on recommendations and insights, rather than statistical details
Read full review
Microsoft
  • As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
  • However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.
Read full review
Qlik
  • You can use the free desktop version to do a lot of reporting and analysis work more quickly so the ROI is huge
  • QlikView is great at finding outliers such as data entry errors
  • QlikView is great at helping you quickly discover new insights about your business that can prompt you to take action that can immediately affect your cash flow.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QlikView Screenshots

Screenshot of QlikView Sales DashboardScreenshot of QlikView on all devicesScreenshot of QlikView using mobile touch screen