Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Power Virtual Server
Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Power Virtual Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure Red Hat OpenShift | N/A | Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. The version provides joint engineering, operation, and support from Microsoft and Red Hat, with multiple compliance certifications. | N/A | |
IBM Power Virtual Server | N/A | IBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads. | N/A |
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Power Virtual Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Power Virtual Server |
|---|
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Power Virtual Server | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
|
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | DigitalOcean Droplets Score 9.4 out of 10 | DigitalOcean Droplets Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 9.7 (195 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.9 (4 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.5 (4 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (2 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.0 (1 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 7.5 (3 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (3 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Pros | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Cons | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Usability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Performance | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Scalability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | IBM
|
| ScreenShots |



