Azure Synapse Analytics vs. IBM watsonx.data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Synapse Analytics
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure Synapse Analytics is described as the former Azure SQL Data Warehouse, evolved, and as a limitless analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives users the freedom to query data using either serverless or provisioned resources, at scale. Azure Synapse brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.
$4,700
per month 5,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
IBM watsonx.data
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Watsonx.data is presented as an open, hybrid and governed data store that makes it possible for enterprises to scale analytics and AI with a fit-for-purpose data store, built on an open lakehouse architecture, supported by querying, governance and open data formats to access and share data.N/A
Pricing
Azure Synapse AnalyticsIBM watsonx.data
Editions & Modules
Tier 1
$4,700
per month 5,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
Tier 2
$9,200
per month 10,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
Tier 3
$21,360
per month 24,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
Tier 4
$50,400
per month 60,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
Tier 5
$117,000
per month 150,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
Tier 6
$259,200
per month 360,000 Synapse Commit Units (SCUs)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Synapse AnalyticsIBM watsonx.data
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Synapse AnalyticsIBM watsonx.data
Considered Both Products
Azure Synapse Analytics
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
Synapse, in comparison has its ups and downs against the competitors. However, where it excels, and builds it's markets is the cheaper costs (compared to Redshift), low code platforms and an in house solution that does not need you to leave the Synapse workspace for end to end …
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
Databricks is a complete product with new features constantly coming out. This can be both good or bad, with a lot of innovation comes a responsibility to keep your code and pipelines fresh.

Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
Our team evaluated multiple platform as I mentioned above , but we stacks up Azure Synapse Analytics because :
1. Easy UI and Unified platform advantage
2. Tight integrations with MS ecosystem.
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
They're all part of the Microsoft Azure family, so they are not exactly competitors. They overlap in functionality, but they're targeted at different levels of customers.
Azure Data Factory is an excellent stand-alone PaaS (included in Synapse Analytics) for writing, scheduling, …
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
When client is already having or using Azure then it’s wise to go with Synapse rather than using Snowflake. We got a lot of help from Microsoft consultants and Microsoft partners while implementing our EDW via Synapse and support is easily available via Microsoft resources and …
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
In comparing Azure Synapse to the Google BigQuery - the biggest highlight that I'd like to bring forward is Azure Synapse SQL leverages a scale-out architecture in order to distribute computational processing of data across multiple nodes whereas Google BigQuery only takes into …
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
Azure Synapse Analytics stacks up well against the competitors I mentioned above. Technically, Azure SQL Datawarehouse is an upgraded version of the Azure SQL Database. So, the choice to move from one to the other depends on the processing needs of your company. If you need …
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
We also looked at Oracle Data Warehouse as part of our short list of products to implement as a solution. Oracle's product turned out to have less support by way of easily accessible internet blogs. Oracle was also considerably more expensive and we would have needed to hire …
Chose Azure Synapse Analytics
SQL Data Warehousing is much easier to manage if you already have SQL Server experience and analysts who are familiar with its interface. We are currently piloting using NoSQL and Hadoop type databases but it is difficult to get set up properly. Additionally, we have to …
IBM watsonx.data
Chose IBM watsonx.data
It is better then competitors but not always, it depends on how we use in our environment. IBM watsonx.data has strong data governance.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
Snowflake is a more mature, simpler to use product but watsonx.data has a more open architecture and it better for hybrid cloud environments. In addition, watsonx.data is part of an entire watsonx platform that offers many advantages over is closest competitors. The single …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
Already using the watsonx.orchestrate, so it's was easier to incorporate this into existing infrastructure.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
IBM watsonx.ai and IBM watsonx.governance
Chose IBM watsonx.data
The three pair nicely together to create my own RAG solution in a controlled manner.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
We chose IBM watsonx.data for our organization because IBM watsonx.data has Open-source support
Chose IBM watsonx.data
IBM watsonx.data stacks up against Snowflake very well. It come in at a less expensive price. Also, you can run IBM watsonx.data on any cloud. or on prem.. Much more flexible.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
with iceberg open table format and presto engine the performance and flexibility increased and also with watsonx.ai with GENAI capability which other tools lag as of now.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
We use IBM watsonx.data as a unified data platform to integrate and govern data across systems, eliminating silos and improving data quality. Its open lakehouse architecture enables faster, trusted access to data for AI, analytics, and reporting, forming the foundation for …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
Salesforce Genie and Snowflake
Chose IBM watsonx.data
Oracle really cost effective solution, where it has the support of community, with rich integration of all wide range of oracle products.
Amazon sageMaker is another cost effective solution, where is tightly coupled with AWS platform, in terms of performance it copes up really …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
IBM watsonx.data integrates well with other IBM services used in our deployment and provides enterprise grade security which is critical for our regulated business
Chose IBM watsonx.data
AstraDB was giving me vector database solutions, Retrieval Augmented Generation features and even Agentic workflows that IBM watsonx.data does not have currently. But the volume of data I've coming everyday and has to deal with everyday, can do anomaly detection just in plain …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
Pinecone and IBM watsonx.data (Milvus in our case) both work great as a full-managed cloud-based vector database.
We selected IBM watsonx.data because it integrates well with watson.ai and is a little more beginner friendly than pinecone, but I think both are great anyway.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
IBM watsonx.data helps in reducing data warehousing costs. IBM AIOps Insights focuses mainly on incident management, while IBM watsonx.data provides a flexible data store.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
May be I cannot say why I choose, business preferred to use IBM watsonx.data which is good for me as well to learn. I cannot compare this tool with others because it has unique feature which alteryx or Amazon or Azure dont have. So this tool is going good for us.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
I believe DataStax Enterprise is the best in class. There are some things that are different with the schema-less systems but I found DataStax Enterprise easiest to implement while evaluating. The replication is on par or better than others in practice. We are evaluating …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
DataStax Enterprise offered best-in-class write performance and scalability. The customer support team was very helpful in the adoption of new technology.
Chose IBM watsonx.data
DataStax has an amazing community built around it and is also Cassandra is an open-source technology. The customer support is quite good compared to other vendors. Though you initially need to spend some hefty amount on infrastructure, in the long run, it makes up for it. We …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
We chose datastax because we need a system always available and capable of ingesting a large amount of data per second, even if eventually consistent and with multi data center sync native support.

We considered Cloudera as an alternative using Kafka as the ingestion layer but …
Chose IBM watsonx.data
Amazon DynamoDB and Datastax Cassandra are similar on masterless architecture and principles, DynamoDB is managed and needs cost analysis. If you need to have better control, Datastax is better.

I also did a prototype with Google Spanner in one of the recent innovation days, it …
Best Alternatives
Azure Synapse AnalyticsIBM watsonx.data
Small Businesses
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Synapse AnalyticsIBM watsonx.data
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Synapse AnalyticsIBM watsonx.data
Likelihood to Recommend
In terms of a well-suited scenario - the Azure Synapse can be used to capture data from multiple sources (especially from onPrem sources apart from Dataverse) and update the transformed data based on the given conditions (eg: refresh data based on the specified date/time ranges). Also, the transformed data can simply be transferred to Azure Data Lake for further processing by utilizing other analytics tools such as PowerBI.
Read full review
Datastax Cassandra is a Java based linearly scalable NoSQL database, best-in-class tunable performance, fault tolerant, distributed, masterless, time series database and has easy-to-use administration and monitoring functionality with opscenter. Configured correctly there is no downtime and no data loss. The documentation is exhaustive, and the community is agile and supportive, and Datastax provides good support. For all these reasons, Datastax Cassandra has become a NoSQL technology of choice for many platforms. However it has some time investment on infrastructure and regular operational tasks, and if you do not have bandwidth for it, a managed NoSQL solution like DynamoDB might be more appropriate. Also if you have search needs on Cassandra and do not have corresponding Spark/Solr setup, Datastax Cassandra might not be ideal for you.
Read full review
Pros
  • The combination of SQL/unstructured data
  • Keeping things "complicated, but simple"; [heterogeneous] data formats seen as just SQL tables to business experts used to use Power BI, Excel, and any other traditional SQL-oriented BI tools
  • Integration options using "Synapse pipelines", the application of ADFs
  • The greatly integrated solution of independent things (Spark MPP cluster, MPP SQL Servers, ADFs) - all sitting under one roof. Great job!
  • Integration with super-fast, globally replicated data. I really appreciate the integration of NoSQL databases (namely Core API and Mongo API under Cosmos DB) with purely batch-processed BI data
Read full review
  • It doesn't just store data but unlocks potential. I am able to analyse a vast amount of information, identify trends, and predict future outcomes.
  • It not only gives me high quality but accessible data as well. It handles missing values, outliers and feature engineering with case.
Read full review
Cons
  • With Azure, it's always the same issue, too many moving parts doing similar things with no specialisation. ADF, Fabric Data Factory and Synapse pipeline serve the same purpose. Same goes for Fabric Warehouse and Synapse SQL pools.
  • Could do better with serverless workloads considering the competition from databricks and its own fabric warehouse
  • Synapse pipelines is a replica of Azure Data Factory with no tight integration with Synapse and to a surprise, with missing features from ADF. Integration of warehouse can be improved with in environment ETl tools
Read full review
  • Integration complexity with Security Tools while watsonx.Data is well-suited for native tools, but integration with third-party security tools requires custom connectors or manual ETL pipelines. which leads to an increase in setup time.
  • User interface and query time can be improved.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
As an open source technology Cassandra can be readily used with or without any commercial support. DataStax provides value-added services and features, and in the end it is up to individual situations to strike a balance between the desirability of such support/service versus the associated cost.
Read full review
Usability
The data warehouse portion is very much like old style on-prem SQL server, so most SQL skills one has mastered carry over easily. Azure Data Factory has an easy drag and drop system which allows quick building of pipelines with minimal coding. The Spark portion is the only really complex portion, but if there's an in-house python expert, then the Spark portion is also quiet useable.
Read full review
DataStax has a good community built around it and has amazing scalability options. Though the initial setup is a bit costly, in the long run, it makes up for it. It also has powerful monitoring tools and a clean UI.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
good recovery features
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
scalable product
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft does its best to support Synapse. More and more articles are being added to the documentation, providing more useful information on best utilizing its features. The examples provided work well for basic knowledge, but more complex examples should be added to further assist in discovering the vast abilities that the system has.
Read full review
We have had a few situations where we caused an outage or something has gone wrong and we are able to get a support person to offer live help within minutes. The escalation process is excellent - the best I've seen - and the support team is incredibly strong. Outside of emergencies, the team is very helpful with general questions and working through data model exercises and the subscription I believe still comes with some hours to help get the data model reviewed.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
easy to follow documentation, support is there when needed
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
use saas service
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
They're all part of the Microsoft Azure family, so they are not exactly competitors. They overlap in functionality, but they're targeted at different levels of customers. Azure Data Factory is an excellent stand-alone PaaS (included in Synapse Analytics) for writing, scheduling, and monitoring pipelines. Azure SQL Database (and all the Azure SQL family) is excellent for traditional, SQL-based data warehouses, especially if you're migrating from on-premises. Combined with Azure Data Factory (that can run SSIS packages), it's a perfect solution for a simple path to the cloud. Azure Databricks is effectively the only internal "competitor" to Synapse Analytics but targeted more to a "platform-agnostic" audience. On the other hand, Synapse is more of a proprietary mix of products that are more tightly related to Microsoft technologies.
Read full review
I believe DataStax Enterprise is the best in class. There are some things that are different with the schema-less systems but I found DataStax Enterprise easiest to implement while evaluating. The replication is on par or better than others in practice. We are evaluating Astra in our test environment and that has additional benefits we are looking forward to using.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
cognos integration works great
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It definitely has a positive impact on ROI. We are able to use it to generate MORE revenue through predictive analytics and pricing optimization.
  • Because of the SQL Data Warehouse design, we're able to set up some self service reporting tools which allow our users to generate reports ad hoc instead of having a full time employee creating these by hand.
  • Having visibility into the data is very useful for management to make good business decisions.
Read full review
  • for one automation project, we managed to cut cloud storage costs by a third through IBM watsonx.data's lakehouse optimization
  • data integration projects have had a 20 % reduction in turnaround times. Can only imagine how that will improve with the Claude partnership
Read full review
ScreenShots