TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Test Plans

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAzure Test Plans is an exploratory test toolkit available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services. It enables manual testing for users, so that they can plan, execute, and track scripted tests with actionable defects and end-to-end traceability. Assess quality throughout the development lifecycle by testing your desktop or web applications. It is available with Azure DevOps Services.N/A

    BitBar

    Score6.4 out of 10
    N/ABitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices. Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates with the user's current tech stack or CI/CD pipeline. Key Features: * BitBar offers one cloud for all testing platforms whether it be web, native, or hybrid applications. * Test an application across real…

    $39

    per month

    Pricing
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsEnterprise packages are available for larger teams and customers.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Azure Test Plans and BitBar
    Feature
    Azure Test Plans
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    4% above category average
    BitBar
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized test management8.86 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting9.36 Ratings00 Ratings
    Defect management7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.2
    (6 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Test PlansBitBar
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It works well for express test case implementation with a short duration. You can define the tests for two weeks and run the activities documenting the software errors and fixes to control the effectiveness of DevOps. The graphic reports give the idea of the backlog phases advances and errors detected. It needs improvement if you have a large test project and need to design financial budgets and control over costs of the test plan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    CrossBrowserTesting is a great tool to use when you have a new page or new content that you want to test on an array of devices/browsers. In the diverse online world nowadays, it is nearly impossible to ensure optimization for every case. CBT allows you to get closer to that goal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Multi test plan access
    • Well structured and easy to use
    • Integrates with other azure features to work seamlessly ,connecting the data flow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Allows me to test on our development server with ease which is behind a firewall.
    • Using automation for my tests.
    • Screenshots of the problems on each page.
    • Ability to jump between screen sizes quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Graphic definition of the the Work Break Down Structure
    • Gantt Chart to check the activity dependance and flow of the process
    • Basic cost module to design test budgets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Test case support is somewhat limited in customization ability.
    • Not a unique problem to them (or their 'fault'), but content behind VPN or intranet cannot be scanned.
    • Pricing with tier level and features can sometimes be confusing (ie. what is and what is not included).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We're doing a full continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), continuous testing (CT), security, delivery, and monitoring. They have been lately adding features to the services on a regular basis. Every two weeks, they add functionality to Azure DevOps Services to match it with what Azure DevOps Server or on-prem would offer. So, we continue to get more robust functionality. My favorite right now is that they are starting to open up the API availability within Azure DevOps Services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Selenium: 1. Selenium is Open source tool 2. Needs proper framework development and integration with multiple 3rd party tools 3. Not much secure 4. Needs scripting knowledge for people working on it 5. takes time and effort CrossBrowser Testing: 1. Licensed , so secure 2. Less time , less effort 3. Quick results 4. No scripting language knowledge needed 5. More coverage 6. Without any framework creation also we can test on multiple devices/browsers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Pros: One stop solution for end to end traceability
    • Pros: Exploratory testing used
    • Pros: maximum coverage on multiple browsers, operating system combinations
    • Cons: Integration with Non-Microsoft tools can be improved
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • By using CrossBrowserTesting we are saving many hours a week in manual work hours.
    • Our automated Selenium tests run in a fraction of the time it takes to manually test our components, so we can spend more time building great user experiences and less time triaging bugs.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots