TrustRadius

Azure Virtual WAN vs. Cloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual WAN
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Virtual WAN connects global branch offices, point-of-sale locations, and sites using Azure and the Microsoft global network. With it the user can plan, configure, and seamlessly deploy new connections.N/A
Cloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare Magic WAN is a security-as-a-service (SECaaS) solution designed to extend the capabilities of a traditional Wide Area Network (WAN) to the cloud. It functions by utilizing Cloudflare’s global anycast network to provide a unified, secure edge for all traffic, including internet-bound, SaaS, and site-to-site connectivity. Network Architecture and Connectivity Magic WAN replaces or augments traditional hardware-based WAN architectures (such as SD-WAN or MPLS) by…N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual WANCloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual WANCloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual WANCloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Best Alternatives
Azure Virtual WANCloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Virtual WANCloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual WANCloudflare WAN (Magic WAN)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Virtual WAN provides single functional interphase for routing, monitoring, connectivity and security operations. The connection of hubs in Azure virtual WAN makes it simple for us to use Microsoft as the pillar of our spoke connectivity. The platform provides us with robust connectivity features that allow for transitive connectivity across different spokes. However, you should always ensure you have understood your total cost of ownership to avoid potential price bombshells.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • It offers a seamless experience while connecting Virtual networks and Workloads via Azure Hub.
  • Lot of connectivity options present - site to site VPN/Express route etc.
  • Very easy connectivity and migration with on-premise sites and Azure Hub.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • Integrations are limited within Azure. It is difficult to carry out multi-cloud integrations.
  • If you haven't understood your monthly cost you can receive price shocks.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
As we were already using Azure as a cloud platform, it was easy setting up a Virtual WAN inside Azure as users/developers and DevOps engineers were familiar with the user interface and functioning as compared to going to some other portal for just the VWAN solution. The umbrella of features provided by Azure Virtual WAN made it the right choice for our infrastructure.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Automatic troubleshooting solves incidents without costing our operational time.
  • We are able unify all our operational activities.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots