Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup vs. NetApp SaaS Backup

You know Microsoft does not back up your data. You'd better get that going before you run into a legal issue.

Incentivized

My favorite feature of cloud data management is that it's simple to get all the business reports and analytics I need from a variety of data sources in a matter of minutes. As far as I'm concerned, it's the finest I've come across in terms of backup and safe access control.

Incentivized

• Easy to navigate user interface
• Straight forward restore jobs/export jobs
• Easy to check status of current backups
• Scheduled reporting

Incentivized

• Restores and searches are simple to carry out.
• Very simple to use design.
• Complex data recovery.

Incentivized

• Searching for a user to restore does not work
• More than 1 Sharepoint backup per week would be nice

• The process of securing the transfer of large amounts of data is difficult.
• At times, keeping track of several data backups might be complicated.
• Powerful devices are needed to recover data from the Cloud.

Incentivized

I looked briefly at Veeam, but Barracuda is so much easier.

Incentivized

We utilize it to implement database and cloud backups. It's a lot more efficient than Rubrik, for example. SLA domains can be used to establish backup and retention depending on business requirements because of the high frequency of backups. Additionally, NetApp SaaS Backup provides a constant cloud product backup.

Incentivized

• Lost productivity when someone deletes a cloud stored item and we can retrieve it.
• Rouge creation of teams and no owners are assigned- we get notified.

Incentivized

• Cloud-based data loss management tools make data recovery a breeze.
• Data management for consumers is straightforward and good.
• Solutions for archiving and extracting data quickly.

Incentivized