BIC Process Execution vs. Microsoft BizTalk Server vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BIC Process Execution
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
BIC Process Execution is designed to enable the user to automate processes in a few clicks. With No Code and Low Code technology, the user can automate processes by capturing workflows graphically. BIC Process Execution generates executable workflows from this, without the user needing to write a single line of code, enabling users to digitalize processes. At the same time, the solution aims to drive fewer process errors and significant process acceleration across the board. With RPA…N/A
Microsoft BizTalk
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalk ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalkOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalk ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Features
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalk ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
BIC Process Execution
-
Ratings
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
36 Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.036 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings00 Ratings8.535 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.036 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalk ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Boomi
Boomi
Score 7.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Boomi
Boomi
Score 7.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalk ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
7.5
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BIC Process ExecutionMicrosoft BizTalk ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
  • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
  • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
  • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
  • Helps in load balancing.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
  • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
  • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
Read full review
Oracle
  • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
  • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
  • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Performance
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
Read full review
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
GBTEC Software AG
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots