Likelihood to Recommend BioClinica ICL is well suited for meeting the requirements for regulatory filling and submission support, imagining collection and QC, centralized independent review for consistency purposes, site training and imagining archiving and sharing. The Bioclinica team also assist you with creating the database based on the protocol and study design. Bioclinical ICL has all the features to meet the requirements for medical imagining but they can ensure that their interface is more intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review REDCap surveys are very suitable for clinical trials and public health surveys. It's less appropriate for market researches .
Read full review Pros The system is very easy to use by the end user. Uploading of images by the site is a very streamlined process BioClinica has the capability to centrally read the CT scan images by their own internal radiologist for consistency purposes BioClinica has a very good customer service and helpline Read full review Customization. I can use HTML to change format but there are also a ton of built in functionality for branching logic, matrix configuration, slider scales, etc. Security. HIPPA compliance is extremely important for medical research and REDCap ensures our data is safe. Variety of use. Being able to send both surveys and create forms for internal use makes the use cases numerous. Read full review Cons Report generating should be more robust and up to date. Clinical trial sites receive multiple queries for the same images even after the sites have responded to the same query. The webiste to upload images by the site is good but I have used other similar software which is more intuitive and easy to maneuver. Read full review I don't really see many issues with REDCap. Read full review Usability It is very interesting to me especially that it meets all my needs. The libraries makes the job even much easier, since you can just make a few adjustments to the appropriate template chosen
Read full review Support Rating They respond almost immediately to queries
Read full review Alternatives Considered Parexel also has the capability to collect medical images in a central repository database. Parexel's uploading website is very intuitive and very easy to use. BioClinica can easily ensure that their uploading website is more user-friendly and the interface is easy to understand. Overall Bioclinica ICL is a very good option for pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies.
Read full review SurveyMonkey and
Google Forms have similar features for surveys but they lack the form options and user interface. They are also not HIPPA compliant so we are not able to collect any identifying information which is usually an issue in research when we are tracking participants. Many institutional review boards won't even approve a study without a HIPPA compliant data collection service.
Read full review Return on Investment BioClinica ICL was able to meet our protocol and study design to create a central repository of all the images collected by the sites It ensured timely filling of study data to regulatory by ensuring the images data are submitted to regulatory authority as supporting documents It ensured that sites were able to upload imagining documents without extra burden on them Read full review REDCap allowed us to house all patient information in one single portal which helped us eliminate the need for paper copies. We moved our whole filing system to an electronic version when we became "live" on REDCap. It is also very convenient and accessible to have all of this data in one location. A very positive impact is the ability for multiple users to see the same health and wellness information for each specific patient. Instead of constantly having to go back and forth via email, phone, etc. to ask about the patient; we could simply look up their information in REDCap and find all of the answers. It made our business much more efficient and made the patients feel as though we did our research prior to meeting with them. Read full review ScreenShots