TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Bitbucket Server (discontinued) vs. Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ABitbucket Server (formerly Stash) from Atlassian was a self-hosted source code management solution. The product is no longer available for sale, and support for existing licenses ended in 2024.N/A

    Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps

    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Plastic was a version control system for facilitating branching, diffing and merging. It was acquired by Unity, and its features are part of Unity DevOps. The application is no longer available for sale.

    $6.95

    per user

    Pricing
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Cloud Edition
    $6.95
    per user
    Team Edition (on prem)
    $9.95
    per user
    Enterprise Edition
    $23.25
    per user
    Enterprise Edition (perpetual)
    $595.00
    per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (11 ratings)
    8.4
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    Bitbucket Server would be good to use if you are not extremely reliant on the availability of your code at any given moment. If you have other systems relying on the up status of Bitbucket Server that can cause problems if unable to reach it -- you might consider going with a different product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • Pull requests / code reviews are simple but effective - it's easy to discuss the changes and enforce quality gates (through integration with Bamboo)
    • The access control model is fairly granular, with per-branch and per-action permission configuration options
    • There are various plugins available to extend functionality, such as SonarQube
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Version Control
    • Organizing Workflow
    • Transparency
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) should be evaluated for implementation based on the capacity of the environment ownership and support.
    • Insights and analytics reports are basic.
    • Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) as part of Atlassian tools has some restrictions for centralized user management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Interface
    • Documentation
    • Learning curve
    • Unity integration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Discontinued Products
    Because we're so locked in, it's likely we'll be using Bitbucket Server for a while, unfortunately.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Discontinued Products
    The usability of its interface is pretty straight forward when it comes to creating projects and repositories, but when you have to dive into finer grained portions of the UI things can get tricky. If you are used to using tools like GitHub or Gitlab -- Bitbucket is just different enough to be a bother.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Discontinued Products
    Never really needed any support as the application is very easy to set up and maintain. Any questions we had were well documented in their online documentation, and community forum.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    Stash was selected before I was at the company, but we're looking at these alternatives and actively considering switching. Stash seems to have all the necessary features we need to make it work, but it doesn't have any bells and whistles or extra special features that we can use to create more advanced integrations with other products like Jenkins or Amazon Web Services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • Stash has certainly improved the productivity of the team. We no longer have to use Shared Drive on network which is prone to hacks and errors to manage our code.
    • During the process of releases, the release engineering team can pull the latest and approved code from Stash and need not be dependent upon the availability of the developers during their non availability. It improves productivity and fastens the ETA for requests.
    • We have stayed on course for project deadlines since introduction of Stash and helps us achieve the goals of timely completion of projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Easy to use
    • Cheap
    • Better than git for us
    • Artists love it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot