BlazeMeter vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

BlazeMeter

25 Reviews and Ratings

IBM DevOps Test UI

IBM DevOps Test UI

14 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
BlazeMeter	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform, supported by Broadcom since the acquisition of CA Technologies in 2018 and now by Perforce since the September 2021 acquisition, provides scriptless test automation, as well as unified functional and performance testing. It allows users to test and monitor public, private, and 3rd party APIs, and is deployable as a SaaS, or deployed from a private cloud.	$199 per month
IBM DevOps Test UI	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.	N/A

Pricing

BlazeMeter

IBM DevOps Test UI

Editions & Modules

Basic: $149.00
per month
Pro: $649.00
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeter	IBM DevOps Test UI
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	BlazeMeter	IBM DevOps Test UI
Top Pros	Pro Open source Pro Faster and easier Pro Load testing	Pro Built in functions Pro Supports multiple Pro Multiple languages
Top Cons	Minus Learning curve Minus High learning curve Minus Drill down	Minus Legacy applications Minus Visual basic Minus Ibm support

Best Alternatives
	BlazeMeter	IBM DevOps Test UI
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 8.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10	SoapUI Open Source Score 7.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	BlazeMeter	IBM DevOps Test UI
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (5 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	BlazeMeter	IBM DevOps Test UI
Likelihood to Recommend	Perforce Software It is well suited for applications that are mission-critical or applications that can receive high traffic/transactions at unscheduled time periods. Using the load testing feature of BlazeMeter, we can test and ascertain the capacity of the application without the drawbacks of the usual Apache JMeter load testing which depends heavily on the host system from where the load testing is performed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Perforce Software Results are easy to read Tests can be run easily Tests can ben imported easily from jMeter Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps. Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues. A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Perforce Software BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests. BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package. BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors. No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer. Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Perforce Software Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Perforce Software It helped positively by helping to identify the maximum capacity needed for high traffic periods Saved revenue by eliminating unwanted duplication of systems Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing. Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots