TrustRadius

BlazeMeter vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$199
per month
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
Pricing
BlazeMeterIBM DevOps Test UI
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeterIBM DevOps Test UI
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeterIBM DevOps Test UI
Best Alternatives
BlazeMeterIBM DevOps Test UI
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMeterIBM DevOps Test UI
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(5 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMeterIBM DevOps Test UI
Likelihood to Recommend
Perforce Software
It is well suited for applications that are mission-critical or applications that can receive high traffic/transactions at unscheduled time periods. Using the load testing feature of BlazeMeter, we can test and ascertain the capacity of the application without the drawbacks of the usual Apache JMeter load testing which depends heavily on the host system from where the load testing is performed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Perforce Software
  • Results are easy to read
  • Tests can be run easily
  • Tests can ben imported easily from jMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Perforce Software
  • BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests.
  • BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package.
  • BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Perforce Software
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Perforce Software
  • It helped positively by helping to identify the maximum capacity needed for high traffic periods
  • Saved revenue by eliminating unwanted duplication of systems
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots