BMC AMI DevX vs. Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BMC AMI DevX
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
BMC AMI DevX is an integrated software platform that provides mainframe development teams with modern Application Development and DevOps capabilities. The solution connects traditional mainframe environments with contemporary development practices through components for source code management, testing, debugging, and analytics.N/A
Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Matrix Requirements helps medical device companies to manage their design and quality system, offering products that manage medical device requirements, specifications, risks and tests ensuring full traceability and ensuring compliance regulations for quality systems. MatrixALM can be used to manage all design inputs and outputs in one place and makes it visible for the whole team at any time supporting any workflow: Waterfall, V-Model or Agile.
$500
per month per user
Pricing
BMC AMI DevXMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Matrix Essential
$500
per month per seat
Matrix Team
$750
per month per seat
Matrix Company
$1,145
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BMC AMI DevXMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWe also have an enterprise offering. Speak to our team to learn more!
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BMC AMI DevXMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Best Alternatives
BMC AMI DevXMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.0 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BMC AMI DevXMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BMC AMI DevXMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend
BMC Software Inc.
I love these tools! However, my company has not yet transitioned from SCLM to a modern repository, and this is causing most of our developers to remain within TSO for all their development. It's been a slow adoption up to this point, but we are moving toward more modernization this year and next, so with any luck, we'll see usage pick up. Success depends on the speed at which your management is willing to move.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Pros
BMC Software Inc.
  • The tool I use is fairly intuitive. It doesn't take long to be using it full time.
  • Changing the layout/view is fairly easy. This allows it to fit individual preferences.
  • It is helpful to be able to view specific windows in full screen. Usually, I have it set up to view multiple windows, but sometimes, I just want to view one window in full-screen mode.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Cons
BMC Software Inc.
  • Download source code plug-in on Azure DevOps to allow downloading prod version even if it's not in the assignment.
  • Publishing Test Results on Azure DevOps from Total Test plugin
  • Integration with DevEnterprise in Workbench and GenAI capabilities for enhance code analysis (Accross multiple programs/applications)
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
BMC Software Inc.
Support has been amazing compared to Optim. Further, new features are very regular with File-AID - I can't remember the last time Optim had a significant update. File-AID support is very receptive to feature requests and reported bugs, including sending out hotfixes quickly.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
BMC Software Inc.
The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. All of them had their advantages and disadvantages. Code Pipeline, however, stands head and shoulders above the rest in simplicity, completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, and elegance.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
BMC Software Inc.
  • Possitive impact. It is main product suite to enable devops in the mainframe applications team. All developers use these on day-to-day work.
  • Negative impact: Recent usability issues caused disappointment in the application teams. It became hard motivate the development community to increase usage.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

BMC AMI DevX Screenshots

Screenshot of BMC AMI DevX Workbench for VS CodeScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code Insights ft BMC AMI Assistant in Visual StudioScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code Insights ft Runtime VisualizerScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code PipelineScreenshot of BMC AMI zAdviser Enterprise